The Moral Economy of Thrift: The Production of the Indebted Self in the Reality Series Getting out of Debt and Life or Debt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.19v11a26Keywords:
Debts, debt discourse, reality TV, subjectification, moral economyAbstract
In this article, the intersection of the economic and social dimensions of thrift is analysed under the special condition of debt. The debt context serves as a focal glass exposing agents, their social practices and strategies of accumulation capitals with regard to appropriate spending. In order to capture the many layers of thrift, the concept of moral economies is applied. This concept tries to reconcile two seemingly divergent dimensions of human behaviour which can be described as individualistic, calculating and serving a self-interest (economy) on the one hand and community-oriented and benefitting a common good (morality) on the other hand. Starting out with an overview over studies on moral economies in historical and social science since the early 1970s, I will explain the heuristic use of the concept for the case of debts research and apply it to representations of thrift as visualised and popularised in the reality TV shows Raus aus den Schulden (Getting Out of Debt) and Life or Debt. Here, the images of homes are clues for the cultural productions of appropriateness on TV: What are suitable ways of living when in debt? What are adequate scenes of dwelling and narratives of dealing with debts and which normative structures regulate those stories, the perception of the self and potential social exclusion? By examining the TV show as a strong voice in the debt discourse, thrift turns out to be a cornerstone in the internal and external regimes of governing debt in the micropolitics of TV.
References
Caplovitz, David (1967): The poor pay more: consumer practices of low-income families. New York: Free Press.
Carrier, James G. (2018): “Moral economy: What’s in a name,” Anthropological Theory, 18:1, 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499617735259
Daston, Lorraine (1995): “The Moral Economy of Science,” Osiris, 2nd ser., 10: 2, 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1086/368740
Dion, Delphine, Sabri Ouidade & Valérie Guillard (2014): “Home Sweet Messy Home: Managing Symbolic Pollution,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 565- 589. https://doi.org/10.1086/676922
Fassin, Didier (2009): “Moral economies revisited,” Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 64:6, 1237-1266, English version here: https://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_ANNA_646_1237--moral-economies-revisited.htm#re1no1 (accessed 28/1/2019).
Fassin, Didier (2016): “Vom Rechtsanspruch zum Gunsterweis. Zur moralischen Ökonomie der Asylvergabepraxis im heutigen Europa,” Mittelweg 36: Wandern. Zur Globalgeschichte der Migration, 25:1, 62-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0395264900027499
Fontaine, Laurence (2014): The moral economy of credit. Poverty, Credit, and Trust in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Götz, Norbert (2015): “Moral Economy: Its Conceptual History and Analytical Prospect,” Journal of Global Ethics, 11:2, 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2015.1054556
Life or Debt, trailer, Spike TV.
Löfgren, Orvar (2014): “The black box of everyday life: entanglements of stuff, affects and activities,” Cultural Analysis, 13, 77-98.
McCloskey, Deirdre (2011): “The Prehistory of American Thrift,” James D. Hunter & Joshua J. Yates (eds): Thrift and Thriving in America. Capitalism and Moral Order from the Puritans to the Present. Oxford: Oxford UP, 61-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199769063.003.0003
Mertens, Daniel (2015): Erst sparen, dann kaufen? Privatverschuldung in Deutschland. Frankfurt am Main/New York: campus.
Meyer, Silke (2017): Das verschuldete Selbst. Narrativer Umgang mit Privatinsolvenz. Frankfurt am Main/New York: campus.
Napoletano, Gino (2012): Privatinsolvenz und Restschuldbefreiung: Fresh Start oder “bürgerlicher Tod”? Rechtspolitische Überlegungen zur Entschuldung natürlicher Personen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ökonomischer Aspekte. Hamburg: Dr. Kovaç.
Nohr, Rolf F. (2014): “SuSi-Fernsehen. Beratung, Empowerment und Denormalisierungsangst,” Andrea Seier & Thomas Waitz (eds): Klassenproduktion. Fernsehen als Agentur des Sozialen. Münster: LIT, 193-212.
Ouellette, Laurie & James Hay (2008): Better Living Through Reality TV: Television and Post-Welfare Citizenship. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Palmer, Gareth (2003): Discipline and Liberty. Television and Governance. Manches ter: Manchester UP.
Palomera, Jaime & Theodora Vetta: “Moral economy: Rethinking a radical concept,” Anthropological Theory, 16:4, 413-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499616678097
Podkalicka, Aneta & Jason Potts (2014): “Towards a general theory of thrift,” International Journal of Cultural Studies, 17:3, 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877913496198
Raus aus den Schulden, “Marco S. und Marina D. aus Lüdenscheid”, probono Fernsehproduktion GmbH, RTL, October 27 2010.
Raus aus den Schulden, “Der Fall K. aus Bielefeld”, probono Fernsehproduktion GmbH, RTL, November 9 2011.
Scott, James C. (1976): The Moral Economy of the Peasant. Rebellion and Subsistence in South East Asia. New Haven: Yale UP.
Seier, Andrea (2009): “Mikropolitik des Fernsehens. Reality-Fernsehen als Regierung aus der Distanz,” KultuRRevolution. Zeitschrift für angewandte Diskurstheorie, 45, 47-52.
Siméant, Johanna (2015): “Three bodies of moral economy: the diffusion of a concept,” Journal of Global Ethics, 11:2, 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2015.1054559
Suter, Mischa (2016): Rechtstrieb. Schulden und Vollstreckung im liberalen Kapitalismus 1800–1900. Konstanz: Wallstein/Konstanz UP.
Tellmann, Ute (2013): “Verschulden. Die moralische Ökonomie der Schulden,” ilinx. Berliner Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft, 3, 3-24.
Thompson, Edward Palmer (1971): “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century,” Past & Present, 50:1, 76-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/past/50.1.76
Thompson, Edward Palmer (1991): The Moral Reviewed. Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture. New York: Merlin, 259-351.
Wacquant, Loïc (2012): “Three steps to a historical anthropology of actually existing neo-liberalism”. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 20, 1, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2011.00189.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Silke Meyer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.