Studying Ad Targeting with Digital Methods: The Case of Spotify
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1792212Keywords:
digital methods, SpotifyAbstract
Abstract not available.
References
Angwin, Julia et. al. (2016): ‘Facebook Doesn’t Tell Users Everything It Really Knows About Them,’ ProPublica, December 27. Accessed August 19, 2017. www. propublica.org.
Grasseger, Hannes and Mikael Krogerus (2017): ‘The Data that Turned the World Upside Down,’ Vice Magazine, January 30. Accessed August 19, 2017. www.vice. com.
Greenberg, David M. et al (2016): ‘The Song Is You: Attribute Dimensions Reflect Personality,’ Social Psychology and Personality Science 7(6): 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616641473
Hölck, Katharina (2016): Beyond the Single Platform: An Assessment of the Functioning and Regulatory Challenges of Multi-Layered Platform Systems in the Media and Communications Sector. Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
Holt, Jennifer and Alisa Perren (eds.) (2009): Media Industries: History, Theory, and Method. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Madrigal, Alexis C. (2017): ‘Google and Facebook Have Failed Us,’ The Atlantic, October 2. Accessed October 2, 2017. www.theatlantic.com.
Marres, Noortje (2017): Digital Sociology. The Reinvention of Social Research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Meyer, Robinson (2017): ‘Could Facebook Have Caught Its “Jew Hater” Ad Targeting?,’ The Atlantic, September 15. Accessed October 2, 2017. www.theatlantic. com.
Nudd, Tim (2016): ‘Spotify Crunches User Data in Fun Ways for This New Global Outdoor Ad Campaign,’ Adweek, November 29, 2016. Accessed October 24, 2016. www.adweek.com.
Rogers, Richard (2013): Digital Methods. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sandvig, Christian and Eszter Hargittai (eds.) (2015): Digital Research Confidential: The Secrets of Studying Behavior Online. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Sandvig, Christian (2017): ‘Sandvig v. Sessions: Challenge to CFAA Prohibition on Uncovering Racial Discrimination Online,’ www.aclu.org/cases/sandvig-v-sessions-challenge-cfaa-prohibition-uncovering-racial-discrimination-online, September 12. Accessed August 19, 2017.
Skeggs, Beverley and Simon Yuill (2016): ‘Capital experimentation with person/a formation: how Facebook’s monetization refigures the relationship between property, personhood and protest,’ Information, Communication & Society 19 (3), pp. 380-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1111403
Spotify (2015): The Spotify for Brands Team, ‘Hello private marketplaces. Spotify here.’ 5 November 2015, brandsnews.spotify.com. Accessed August 19, 2017.
Terdiman, Daniel (2015): ‘Spotify Exec: “We Collect An Enormous Amount of Data”,’ Venturebeat, February 24. Accessed August 19, 2017. www.venturebeat.com.
Vonderau, Patrick (2017): ”The Spotify Effect: Digital Distribution and Financial Growth”, Television and New Media (forthcoming).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Roger Mähler, Patrick Vonderau
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.
