Academic Publishing and its Digital Binds: Beyond the Paywall towards Ethical Executions of Code

Authors

  • Teresa Swist Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University, Australia
  • Liam Magee Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1793240

Keywords:

Academic Publishing

Abstract

In this article we explore various constraints and potentials of academic publishing in the digital age. Advancement of digital platforms and their expansive reach amplify the underlying tensions of institutional and scholarly change. A key affordance of these platforms is that of speed: rapidly distributing the outputs of a precaritised profession and responding to pressures to publish as well as the profit motive of publishers. On the one hand, these systems make possible alternative modes of contributory content and peer-production for supporting the commons. On the other, they turn all too readily into privatising devices for contracting labour and profit in the corporate sector and, within the academy, for accentuating subtle power effects. Drawing upon platform studies and integrating insights from political philosophy and property law, our article seeks to problematise neat binaries of possession and dispossession associated with the sector. We examine in particular how co-existing and emergent socio-technical circuits—what we term digital binds—modulate the political economy of academic publishing on a number of scales. These entangled binds constrain but also indicate mechanisms for opening up new possibilities. We introduce three ethical executions of code towards this end: dissuading, detouring, and disrupting. Together, these mechanisms show how mutually beneficial boundaries can be drawn for designing otherwise: by blocking dominant systems and bargaining for fairer practices; exploring sanctioned and unsanctioned systems which offer more diverse publishing pathways; and, disrupting systemic processes and profits towards more inclusive and equitable conditions.

References

Agamben, Georgio (2005): State of Exception, Chicago: University of Chicago.

Al-Saqaf, Walid & Nicolas Seidler (2017): "Blockchain Technology for Social Impact: Opportunities and Challenges Ahead", Journal of Cyber Policy, 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2017.1400084

arXiv (2017). arXiv, https://arxiv.org/help/general, (accessed 13/12/17).

Bernasconi, Andres (2016): "Is there a Latin-American University Model?", International Higher Education: https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ihe/article/view/8031, (accessed 30/6/17).

Biesta, Gert (2012): "Knowledge/Democracy: Notes on the Political Economy of Academic Publishing", International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15:4, 407-419.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2012.696705

Bratton, Benjamin (2015): The Stack, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262029575.003.0010

Bratton, Benjamin (2014): The Black Stack: http://www.e-flux.com/journal/53/59883/the-black-stack/, (accessed 23/6/17).

Brigham, Martin & Lucas D. Introna (2007): "Invoking Politics and Ethics in the Design of Information Technology: Undesigning the Design", Ethics and Information Technology, 9:1, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9131-1

Buranyi, Stephen (2017): "Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?", The Guardian, 27 June 2017: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science, (accessed 30/6/17).

Butler, Declan (2017): "Gates Foundation Announces Open-Access Publishing Venture", Nature, 543(7647), 599.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.21700

Buwert, Peter (2017): "Potentiality: The Ethical Foundation of Design", The Design Journal, 20:sup1, S4459-S4467.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352942

Collyer, Fran (2016): "Global Patterns in the Publishing of Academic Knowledge: Global North, Global South", Current Sociology, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116680020

Edwards, Paul N., Steven J. Jackson, Melissa K. Chalmers, Geoffrey C. Bowker, Christine L. Borgman, David Ribes, Matt Burton & Scout Calvert (2013): "Knowledge Infrastructures: Intellectual Frameworks and Research Challenges", Ann Arbor: Deep Blue.

Feyen, Jan, Matías Milia, Hubert B. Van Hoof, Karina Quinde, Verónica Ochoa, Victoria Abril, Jaime Bojorque ( 2016): "Improving the publication visibility of Ecuador's higher education system": http://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/26256/3/MASKANA%207208.pdf, (accessed 23/6/17).

Fyfe, Aileen, Coate, Kelly, Curry, Stephen, Lawson, Stuart, Moxham, Noah, & Røstvik, Camilla Mørk (2017): Untangling Academic Publishing: A History of the Relationship between Commercial Interests, Academic Prestige and the Circulation of Research, Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/record/546100#.WhSeiWMW38t, (accessed 23/6/17).

Golumbia, David (2015): "Bitcoin as Politics: Distributed Right-Wing Extremism", Geert Lovink, Nathaniel Tkacz, and Patricia de Vries (eds): MoneyLab Reader: An Intervention in Digital Economy, Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2589890

Grimmelmann, James (2010): "The Internet is a Semicommons", Fordham Law Review, 78:6, 2799-2842.

Hart, Michael (1992). "The History and Philosophy of Project Gutenberg", https://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:The_History_and_Philosophy_of_Project_Gutenberg_by_Michael_Hart, (accessed 13/12/17).

Heyman, Tom, Pieter Moors & Gert Storms (2016): "On the Cost of Knowledge: Evaluating the Boycott against Elsevier", Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2016.00007/full, (accessed 23/6/17).
https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2016.00007

Heverly, Robert A (2003): "Information Semicommons", Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 18:4, 1127-1189.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.450280

Himmelstein, Daniel. S., Ariel. R. Romero, Stephen R. McLaughlin, Bastian G. Tzovaras & Casey S. Greene (2017): "Sci-Hub Provides Access to Nearly all Scholarly Literature" (No. e3100v1). PeerJ Preprints 5:e3100v2 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3100v2, (accessed 13/12/17).
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3100v2

Kwon, Diana (2017): "Major German Universities Cancel Elsevier Contracts", The Scientist, 17 July 2017: https://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/49906/title/Major-German-Universities-Cancel-Elsevier-Contracts/, (accessed 15/6/17).

Larivière, Vincent., Stefanie Haustein & Philippe Mongeon (2015): "The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era", PloS one, 10(6), e0127502.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Lincoln, Y.S. (2012): "The Political Economy of Publication: Marketing, Commodification, and Qualitative Scholarly Work", Qualitative Health Research, 22(11),1451-1459.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312457713

Merrett, Christopher (2006): "The Expropriation of Intellectual Capital and the Political Economy of International Academic Publishing", Critical Arts, 20:1, 96-111.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02560040608557779

Moore, Samuel A. (2017): "A Genealogy of Open Access: Negotiations between Openness and Access to Research", Revue Française des Sciences de l' Information et de la Communication. http://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/3220?lang=en, (accessed 13/12/17).
https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.3220

Murray, Martin J. (2017): The Urbanism of Exception. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

O'Neil, Mathieu & Stefano Zacchiroli (2017): "Making Lovework: Editorial Notes for the JoPP issue on Peer Production and Work", The Journal of Peer Production, 10.

Petrini, Carlo & Enrico Alleva (2015): "On the Oligopoly of Academic Publishers", Ann Ist Super Sanità, 51:4, 259-260.

Ponte, Diego, Bozena I. Mierzejewska & Stefan Klein (2017): "The Transformation of the Academic Publishing Market: Multiple Perspectives on Innovation": Electronic Markets, 27:20, 97-100.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0250-9

Priem, Jason, Dario Taraborelli, Paul Groth & Cameron Neylon (2010): "Altmetrics: A manifesto", 26 October 2010. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto, (accessed 13/8/17).

Ren, Xiang & Lucy Montgomery (2015): "Open Access and Soft Power: Chinese Voices in International Scholarship". Media, Culture & Society, 37(3), 394:408.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714567019

Ruppert, Evelyn (2017): "On Doing Words with Things: Citizens, Claims and Digital Acts", https://www.thesociologicalreview.com/blog/on-doing-words-with-thingscitizens-claims-and-digital-acts.html, (accessed 17/12/17).

Schiermeier, Quirin (2017): "Hundreds of German universities set to lose access to Elseiver journal", https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-07817-1, (accessed 13/12/17).

Sci-Hub (2017): "Sci-Hub: removing barriers in the way of science", https://scihub.org/, (accessed 12/8/17).

Smith, Henry E. (2005): "Governing the Tele-Semicommons", Yale Journal on Regulation, 22, 289-314.

Smith, Henry E. (2000): "Semicommon Property Rights and Scattering in the Open Fields", The Journal of Legal Studies, 29:1, 131-169.
https://doi.org/10.1086/468066

Spearpoint, Michael (2017): "A proposed currency system for academic peer review payments using the Blockchain Technology." MDPI 5, 19.
https://doi.org/10.3390/publications5030019

Stavrides, Stavros (2013): "Contested Urban Rhythms: From the Industrial City to the Post-industrial Urban Archipelago", The Sociological Review, 61: S1: 34-50.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12052

Stiegler, Bernard (2015): States of Shock: Stupidity and Knowledge in the 21st Century, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Striphas, Ted (2010): "Acknowledged Goods: Cultural Studies and the Politics of Academic Journal Publishing", Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 7:1, 3-25.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420903527798

Suber, Peter (2006). "Open Access in the United States", in Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects (ed. Neil Jacobs), Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

Swan, Melanie (2015): Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy, http://w2.blockchain-tec.net/blockchain/blockchain-by-melanie-swan.pdf, (accessed 23/6/17).

Telesurtv (2017): "Ecuadorian Government Invested $13.9 Billion in Higher Education", Telesurtv: http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Ecuadorian-Government-Invested-13.9-Billion-in-Higher-Education-20170528-0005.html, (accessed 20/6/17).

Tkacz, Nathaniel. (2012): "From Open Source to Open Government: A Critique of Open Politics", Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 12:4, 386-405.

Wellmon, Chad & Andrew Piper (2017): "Publication, Power, and Partronage: On Inequality and Academic Publishing", Critical Inquiry: http://criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu/publication_power_and_patronage_on_inequality_and_academic_publishing/, (accessed 20/7/17).

Whitworth, Brian & Rob Friedman (2009a): "Reinventing Academic Publishing Online. Part I: Rigor, Relevance and Practice", First Monday, 14(8-3), http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2609/2248, (accessed 23/6/17).
https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v14i8.2609

Whitworth, Brian & Rob Friedman (2009b): "Reinventing Academic Publishing Online. Part II: A Socio-technical Vision", First Monday, 14(9-7), http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2642/2287, (accessed 23/6/17).
https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v14i9.2642

Wilmer, Christopher E. (2017): "Proof-of-Publication Using the Bitcoin Blockchain": https://nfais.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/ANCO2017/wilmer_nfais_2017.pdf, (accessed 12/8/17).

Downloads

Published

2018-02-01

Issue

Section

Mediatization, Mobility and Methods of Knowledge Production