Black Hole Suns: Binarism and Gravity in Cultural Fields
Sociologicial analyses of artistic practice have long drawn on theoretical traditions grounded in binaries and dualisms. Such analytical strategies, exemplified here by field theoretical approaches, center art objects and their movements in and across markets, where binaristic visions of art worlds do offer significant leverage. But when the analyst moves away from markets for art objects and looks to artistic practices the binaristic lens provides, at best, a blurred image with meaningful blind spots. This article suggests an alternative vision of artistic practice —one based on gravity rather than polarity—that captures the ways individuals and their actions make sense in a specific universe of meaning without forcing them into fundamentally competitive and economistic relationships. It leverages findings enabled by a unique sampling strategy in a four year study of visual artists in the United States to illuminate some limitations of binary theoretical frameworks, and outlines a generative alternative to dualism that promotes new analytical and theoretical directions for sociological analyses of artists and artistic practice. This alternative model provides new leverage on four persistent issues in analyses of artistic work: cultural change in occupational fields; actors’ attempts to manage overlapping but incommensurate forms of recognition, reputation, attention, and success; the persistent hegemony of markets for objects in both vernacular and sociological understandings of artistic practice; and questions of visibility and legitimacy central to understanding boundary formation and boundary work in creative fields. The gravitational metaphor promotes a distict set of strategies for the study of artistic work as well as other nontraditional occupations.
Abbott, Andrew (2005): “Ecologies and Fields.” Retrieved September 14, 2017 (http://home.uchicago.edu/aabbott/Papers/BOURD.pdf).
Adams, Julia (2005): “The Rule of the Father: Patriarchy and Patrimonialism in Early Modern Europe.” Pp. 237–66 in Max Weber’s Economy and Society: A Critical Companion, edited by C. Camic, P. S. Gorski, and D. M. Trubek. Stanford University Press.
Alexander, Victoria D. & Anne E. Bowler (2018): “Scandal and the Work of Art: The Nude in an Aesthetically Inflected Sociology of the Arts.” Cultural Sociology https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975518770283.
Biernacki, Richard. (1995): The Fabrication of Labor: Germany and Britain, 1640-1914. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Blanco, Patricia Prieto, Mirjami Schuppert & Jake Lange (2015): “The Digital Progression of Community Archives, from Amateur Production to Artistic Practice: A Case Study of Belfast Exposed.” Convergence 21(1):58–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514560299
de Boise, Sam (2016): “Post-Bourdieusian Moments and Methods in Music Sociology: Toward a Critical, Practice-Based Approach.” Cultural Sociology 10(2):178–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975516628309
Boltanski, Luc & Laurent Thévenot (2006): On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1983): “The Field of Cultural Production, or: The Economic World Reversed.” Poetics 12(4–5):311–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(83)90012-8
Bourdieu, Pierre (1993): The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
Buchholz, Larissa. (2016): “What Is a Global Field? Theorizing Fields beyond the Nation-State.” The Sociological Review Monographs 64(2):31–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/2059-7932.12001
Childress, Clayton (2017): Under the Cover: The Creation, Production, and Reception of a Novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691160382.001.0001
Gerber, Alison. (2014a): “Art Work?: Tradition, Rationalization, and the Valuation of Contemporary Artistic Practice.” Ph.D., Yale University, United States -- Connecticut.
Gerber, Alison (2014b): “The Audit of Venus.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 58(1):6–13.
Gerber, Alison (2017): The Work of Art: Value in Creative Careers. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Gerber, Alison & Clayton Childress (2017a): “I Don’t Make Objects, I Make Projects: Selling Things and Selling Selves in Contemporary Artmaking.” Cultural Sociology 11(2):234–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975517694300
Gerber, Alison & Clayton Childress (2017b): “The Economic World Obverse: Freedom Through Markets After Arts Education.” American Behavioral Scientist 61(12):1532–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217734275
Heinich, Nathalie (1996): The Glory of Van Gogh: An Anthropology of Admiration. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Heinich, Nathalie (2012): “Mapping Intermediaries in Contemporary Art According to Pragmatic Sociology.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 15(6):695–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549412450634
Heise, Tatiana & Andrew Tudor (2007): “Constructing (Film) Art: Bourdieu’s Field Model in a Comparative Context.” Cultural Sociology 1(2):165–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975507078186
Hesmondhalgh, David (2006): “Bourdieu, the Media and Cultural Production.” Media, Culture & Society 28(2):211–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706061682
Howes, David (2005): “Introduction: Empires of the Senses.” Pp. 1–17 in Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg.
Kharchenkova, Svetlana (2018): “The Market Metaphors: Making Sense of the Emerging Market for Contemporary Art in China.” Poetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2018.06.001
Klett, Joseph & Alison Gerber (2014): “The Meaning of Indeterminacy: Noise Music as Performance.” Cultural Sociology 8(3):275–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514523936
Krause, Monika (2018): “How Fields Vary.” The British Journal of Sociology 69(1):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12258
Lamont, Michèle (2012): “How Has Bourdieu Been Good to Think With? The Case of the United States.” Sociological Forum 27(1):228–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01309.x
Lamont, Michèle & Virág Molnár (2002): “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28:167–95. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
Lindström, Sofia (2017): “Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 0(0):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2017.1330334
Lund, Anna (2013): “Staging Gender: The Articulation of Tacit Gender Dimensions in Drama Classes in a Swedish Context.” Gender and Education 25(7):907–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.860430
Malczewski, Eric (2016): “Materiality, Iconic Nature, and Albert Bierstadt’s ‘Great Pictures.’” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 4(3):359–84. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-016-0011-9
McKernan, Brian (2018): “Video Games, Contestation, and Meaning: A Strong Program Approach to Studying Artistic Legitimation.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-018-0060-3
Mears, Ashley (2011): Pricing Beauty: The Making of a Fashion Model. Berkeley, Calif. ; London: University of California Press.
Scarborough, Roscoe C. (2017): “Making It in a Cover Music Scene: Negotiating Artistic Identities in a ‘Kmart-Level Market.’” Sociological Inquiry 87(1):153–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12153
Schwarz, Ori (2016): “The Sociology of Fancy-Schmancy: The Notion of ‘Farterism’ and Cultural Evaluation Under the Regime of Radical Suspicion.” Cultural Sociology https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975515627186.
Silver, Daniel (2018): “Figure It Out!” Sociological Methods & Research https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118769089.
Snyder, Benjamin H. (2013): “From Vigilance to Busyness A Neo-Weberian Approach to Clock Time.” Sociological Theory 31(3):243–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113502482
Solaroli, Marco. (2016): “The Rules of a Middle-Brow Art: Digital Production and Cultural Consecration in the Global Field of Professional Photojournalism.” Poetics 59:50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.09.001
Stark, David. (2009): The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831005
Swedberg, Richard (2016): “Can You Visualize Theory? On the Use of Visual Thinking in Theory Pictures, Theorizing Diagrams, and Visual Sketches.” Sociological Theory 34(3):250–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275116664380
Thompson, E. P. (1967): “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism.” Past & Present (38):56–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/past/38.1.56
Thornton, Patricia H., William Ocasio & Michael Lounsbury (2012): The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. OUP Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
Velthuis, Olav (2005): Talking Prices: Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Weber, Max (1949): On the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe Ill: Free Press.
Weber, Max (2001): The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Captalism. London: Routledge.
Wohl, Hannah (2015): “Community Sense: The Cohesive Power of Aesthetic Judgment.” Sociological Theory 33(4):299–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275115617800
Zelizer, Viviana A. Rotman (2011): Economic Lives: How Culture Shapes the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691139364.001.0001
Culture Unbound is an Open Access journal, indicating that all its content is freely available to anyone with an internet connection. Furthermore we publish all our articles under a Creative Commons license that specify what a user can do with a document. Creative Commons licenses are not an alternative to copyright. They work alongside copyright and enable you to modify your copyright terms to best suit your needs. Culture Unbounduses a so called “Attribution Non-commercial” (CC BY-NC) license which allows users to distribute the work and to re-work it without the author's permission, but not for any commercial purposes and never without acknowledging the original author. Culture Unbound does not charge any publication fees from the authors. Authors are welcome to parallel publish their articles without embargo as long as they include a full reference to the original source.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.