Convergence, Creative Industries and Civil Society: Towards a New Agenda for Cultural Policy and Cultural Studies
Keywords:Creative industries, cultural studies, cultural policy, governmentality
In this article I start with a personal experience “cameo” from 1996 in Australia and extrapolate from that some issues that remain relevant in the sometimes troubled relationship between cultural studies and cultural policy. These are encapsulated in the three “cs” of convergence, creative industries and civil society which provide a new context for both new research and new policy settings. The argument is developed and situated in historical terms by examining the “cultural technologies”, especially the newspaper, and subsequently print media in the 19th century, electronic media in the 20th century and digital media in the 21st century which provide the content, the technologies and the rituals for “imagining” our sense of place and belonging. This is then linked to ways of understanding culture and cultural technologies in the context of governmentality and the emergence of culture as a strategic object of policy with the aim of citizen- and population formation and management. This argument is then linked to four contemporary “testbeds” – cultural mapping and planning, cultural statistics and indicators, cultural citizenship and identity, and research of and for cultural policy – and priorities for cultural policy where cultural studies work has been extremely enabling and productive. The article concludes with an argument, derived from the early 20th century work of Patrick Geddes of the necessity of linking, researching, understanding and operationalising the three key elements and disciplines of Folk (anthropology), Work (economics), and Place (geography) in order to properly situate cultural policy, mapping and planning and their relationship to cultural studies and other disciplines.
Anderson, Benedict (1983): Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.
Appadurai, Arjun (1996): Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, London: University of Minnesota Press.
Bennett, Tony (1994): ”Research and Cultural Development”, M. Breen (ed), Enhancing Cultural Value: Narrowcasting, Community Media and Cultural Development, CIRCIT: Melbourne.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1987): Choses dites, Paris: Editions de Minuit.
DCMS (1998): (Department for Culture, Media and Sport – UK), Creative Industries Mapping Document, London: DCMS.
de Certeau, Michel (1980): La culture au pluriel, Paris: Christian Bourgois.
Donzelot, Jacques (1991) (ed): Face à l’exclusion: le modèle francais, Paris: Editions Esprit.
Foucault, Michel (1979): ”Omnes et singulatim: towards a critique of political reason”, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Grégoire, L’Abbé (1977) (ed.): Albert Soboul Oeuvres Complètes de l’abbé Grégoire, (14 vols), Paris: Editions d’Histoire Sociale.
Grégoire, L’Abbé (1988) (ed.): Frank Paul Bowman, L’abbé Grégoire: éveque de lumières, Paris: Editions France-Empire.
Meller, Helen (1979) (ed.): The Ideal City, Leicester, Leicester University Press
—— (1990) Patrick Geddes: Social Evolutionist and City Planner, London, Routledge.
Mercer, Colin (1997): ”Geographies for the present: Patrick Geddes, urban planning and the human sciences”, Economy and Society, 26(2), 211–232 [Read this article]
Miller, Peter and Nikolas Rose (1990): ”Governing Economic Life”, Economy and Society, 19(1), 1–29. [Read this article]
Oxford English Dictionary (1979): Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roche, Daniel (1987): The People of Paris: An Essay in Popular Culture in the Eighteenth Century, Leamington Spa: Berg.
Sahlins, Marshall (1994): ”A Brief Cultural History of Culture”, Unpublished paper prepared for the UNESCO World Commission on Culture and Development.
Said, Edward (1984): The World, The Text, and the Critic, London: Faber & Faber.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2009 Mercer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.