The Politics of the Gaze: Foucault, Lacan and Žižek
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.102691Keywords:
Film theory, the gaze, Lacan, Foucault, Copjec, ŽižekAbstract
Joan Copjec accuses orthodox film theory of misrepresenting the Lacanian gaze by assimilating it to Foucauldian panopticon (Copjec 1994: 18–19). Although Copjec is correct that orthodox film theory misrepresents the Lacanian gaze, she, in turn, misrepresents Foucault by choosing to focus exclusively upon those aspects of his work on the panopticon that have been taken up by orthodox film theory (Copjec 1994: 4). In so doing, I argue, Copjec misses key parallels between the Lacanian and Foucauldian concepts of the gaze. More than a narrow academic dispute about how to read Foucault and Lacan, this debate has wider political significance. In particular, using Slavoj Žižek’s work, I show that a correct account of the panoptic gaze leads us to rethink the question of how to oppose modern techniques of surveillance.
References
Copjec, Joan (1994): Read My Desire: Lacan Against the Historicists, Harvard: MIT Press.
Foucault, Michel (1996): Foucault Live: Interviews, 1961–1984, Sylvère Lotringer (ed), Lysa Hochroth & John Johnson (trans), New York: Semiotext€.
–––– (1976/1990): The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction, Robert Hurley (trans), New York: Vintage.
Freud, Sigmund (1997): General Psychological Theory, James Strachey (trans), New York: Touchstone.
Lacan, Jacques (1981): The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, Jacques-Alain Miller (ed), Alan Sheridan (trans), New York: Norton.
Žižek, Slavoj (1997): The Plague of Fantasies, London: Verso.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Krips
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.