Super Network on the Prairie: The Discursive Framing of Broadband Connectivity by Policy Planners and Rural Residents in Alberta, Canada

Maria Bakardjieva; Amanda Williams

doi:10.3384/cu.2000.1525.10210153

Authors

Maria Bakardjieva Faculty of Communication and Culture, University of Calgary, Canada
Amanda Williams Communication Studies, Mount Royal University and the University of Calgary, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.10210153

Keywords:

Alberta SuperNet, broadband connectivity, actor-network theory, media space, policy planner discourse, users, sense-making, rural residents

Abstract

This paper focuses on the case of the SuperNet, an infrastructure project designed and sponsored by the provincial government of Alberta, Canada with the objective of providing broadband connectivity to public facilities, businesses and residences in rural communities. The data were collected through individual interviews, focus groups, and town hall meetings in the course of a collaborative research initiative (The SuperNet Research Alliance) that investigated the social construction of the broadband network from multiple perspectives. The objective of the paper is to examine in parallel the discourses in which the concept of broadband connectivity acquired meaning and substance at the levels of 1) provincial government and industry policy planners and 2) the residents of the rural communities who were the intended beneficiaries of the SuperNet. Using actor-network theory as a departure point, this analysis takes stock of the framing devices employed in the two sets of discourses and of the distinctive worldviews that generated them. It looks for the meeting points and the disjunctions between the grand visions and the grounded projections underlying the positions taken by the two respective categories of actors. Differences in the interpretation and appropriation of broadband among rural Albertans themselves are discerned and related to social factors characterizing different situations within rural areas. Rural broadband connectivity thus emerges not so much as a one-dimensional access equalizer for rural people, but as a complex mediator of opportunity, participation and identity.

References

Andersson, Magnus & André Jansson (2010): “Rural Media Spaces: Communication Geography on New Terrain”, Culture Unbound, 2, 121-129. [Read this Article]

Anderson, Terry & Jo-Ann Christiansen (2006): “Perceptions on the Ground: Principals’ Perception of Government Interventions in High-Speed Educational Networking”, Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 5, http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume5/Anderson.pdf

Axia Net Media Corporation (2007): Alberta SuperNet: An Axia Breakthrough Solution, www.ictregulationtoolkit.org/en/Document.3369.pdf

Axia Net Media Corporation. (2009). Alberta SuperNet - Service provider listing by community. http://www.axia.com/documents/networks/ISP_by_community.pdf

Bakardjieva, Maria (2008): “Making Sense of Broadband in Rural Alberta”, Canada. Observatio, 4: 33-53. http://www.obercom.pt/ojs/index.php/obs/article/download/81/146

Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (2007): CRTC Telecommunications Monitoring Report, 2001-2007, (Cat no. 14513), Ottawa, ON.

Callon, Michel (1986): “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay”, John Law (ed): Power, Action and Belief: A new Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge.

Callon, Michel (1991): “Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility”, John Law (ed): A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: Routledge.

Certeau, Michel de (1984): The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Couldry, Nick, & Anna McCarthy (2004): “Introduction: Orientations: Mapping MediaSpace”, Couldry, Nick & Anna McCarthy (eds): MediaSpace: Place, Scale and Culture in a Media Age, London: Routledge.

Dutton, William, Sharon Gillett, Lee McKnight, & Malcolm Peltu (2004): “Bridging Broadband Internet Divides: Reconfiguring Access to Enhance Communicative Power”, Journal of Information Technologies, 19, 28-38. [Read this Article]

Habermas, Jurgen (1984): The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol 2, Boston: Beacon Press.

Hitchins, Russell (2003): “People, Plants and Performance: On Actor Network Theory and the Material Pleasures of the Private Garden”, Social & Cultural Geography, 4:1, 99-114. [Read this Article]

Gberardi, Silvia (2000): “Where Learning is: Metaphors and Situated Learning in a Planning Group”,Human Relations, 53:8, 1057-1080. [Read this Article]

Genus, Audley (2006): “Rethinking Constructive Technology Assessment as Democratic, Effective, Discourse”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73:1, 13-26 [Read this Article]

Jansson, Andre (2007): “Texture: A Key Concept for Communication Geography”, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10: 2, 185-202. [Read this Article]

Latour, Bruno (1999): “On recalling ANT”, John Law & John Hassard (eds.) Actor network theory and after, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Latour, Bruno (2005): Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network-theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Law, John (1999): “After ANT: Complexity, Naming & Topology”, John Law & John Hassard (eds): Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Law, John (2002): Aircraft Stories. Durham: Duke University Press.

Lefebvre, Henri (1991): The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Matear, Maggie: (2002). “Canada must make Broadband Infrastructure a Priority”, Canadian Journal of Communication, 27:2, 461-468.

Mitchell, David (2003): “The Alberta SuperNet Research Alliance”, Canadian Journal of Communication, 28, 219–226.

Mitchell, David (2007). “Broadband at the Margins: Challenges to SuperNet Deployment in Rural and Remote Albertan communities”, Maria Bakardjieva, Fritz Pannekoek and David Taras (eds.): How Canadians Communicate, Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

Mitchell, David, Marco Adria, Maria Bakardjieva & Yvonne Poitras-Pratt (2006, February): “The Constructive Role of Researchers in the Social Shaping of Technology in Communities”, 3rd Prato International Community Informatics Conference, Centre for Community Networking Research, Monash University, Prato, Italy.

Mol, Anne Marie (2003): The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice (Science and Cultural Theory), Durham: Duke University Press.

Murdoch, Jonathan (1997): “Towards a Geography of Heterogeneous Associations”, Progress in Human Geography, 21:3, 321-337. [Read this Article]

Murdoch, Jonathan (1998): “The Spaces of Actor-network Theory”, Geoforum, 29: 357–374. [Read this Article]

Schot, Johan & Arie Rip (1996): “The Past And Future of Constructive Technology Assessment”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54: 251–268. [Read this Article]

Williams, Amanda (2010): Metaphor, Technology and Policymaking: An Investigation of the Alberta SuperNet, (Doctoral dissertation), University of Calgary: Calgary, AB.

Williams, Amanda, Cooper Langford & C. Stelvia Matos (2007): “The Alberta SuperNet: What Does it Mean to Rural Business Communities?”, The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 2:9, 25-34.

Williams, Amanda & Cooper Langford (2007, November): “Metaphors as Tools of Translation: What Metaphor Contributes to Understanding and Appreciating Different Ways of Knowing”, Paper presented by Dr. Langford at the Annual 4S meeting, Montreal, QC.

Woolgar, Steve (2004): “What Happened to Provocation in Science and Technology Studies?”, History & Technology, 20: 4, 339-349. [Read this Article]