Mediatization, Spatial Coherence and Social Sustainability: The Role of Digital Media Networks in a Swedish Countryside Community

Authors

  • André Jansson Media and Communication Studies, Karlstad University, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.10211177

Keywords:

Media, rurality, community, networks, space, network capital

Abstract

What does the implementation of new communication networks mean for the spatial coherence and social sustainability of rural communities? This paper takes its key from Wittel’s discussion of network sociality, understood as the opposite of Gemeinschaft. Wittel’s argument may inform our understanding of how communicative patterns in rural communities are partly reembedded through ongoing media transitions. But it must also be problematized. Relating Wittel’s discussion to Halfacree’s model of spatial coherence and Urry’s notion of network capital, as well as to findings from an ethnographic study in a Swedish countryside community, a more complex view is presented. It is argued that global communication networks under rural conditions contribute to the integration and sustainability of the community, as much as to processes of expansion and differentiation. The results show that network sociality and community constitute interdependent concepts. Through their capacity of linking people to external realms of interest, while simultaneously reinforcing their sense of belonging in the local community, online media promote ontological security at the individual level, thus operating as a social stabilizer.

References

Bakardjieva, Maria (2005): Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life, London: Sage.

Bauman, Zygmunt (2000): Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1979/1984): Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, London: Routledge.

Bunce, Michael (1994): The Countryside Ideal: Anglo-American Images of Landscape, London: Routledge.

Cresswell, Tim (2006): On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World, London: Routledge.

Cruickshank, Jørn A. (2009): “A Play for Rurality – Modernization versus Local Autonomy”, Journal of Rural Studies, 25, 98–107. [Read this Article]

Fish, Robert (2005): “Mobile Viewers: Media Producers and the Televisual Tourist”, David Crouch, Rhona Jackson & Felix Thompson (eds): The Media and the Tourist Imagination: Converging Cultures, London: Routledge. 

Giddens, Anthony (1991): Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Goffman, Erving (1967): Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour, London: Allen Lane, Penguin Press. 

Halfacree, Keith (2006): “Rural Space: Constructing A Three-Fold Architecture”, Paul Cloke, Terry Marsden & Patrick H. Mooney (eds): Handbook of Rural Studies, London: Sage.

Halfacree, Keith (2007): “Trial By Space For A ‘Radical Turn’: Introducing Alternative Localities, Representations and Lives’, Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 125–141. [Read this Article]

Jansson, André (2009a): ”Medierat centrum—marginaliserad idyll: Svenskarnas föreställningar om stad och land”, Sören Holmberg & Lennart Weibull (eds): Svensk höst: Trettiotre kapitel om politik, medier och samhälle, Göteborg: The SOM Institute. 

Jansson, André (2009b): “Mobile Belongings: Texturation and Stratification in Mediatization Processes”, Lundby, Knut (ed.): Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences, New York: Peter Lang.

Jansson, André & Jesper Falkheimer (2006): “Towards a Geography of Communication”, Jesper Falkheimer & André Jansson (eds.) Geographies of Communication, Göteborg: Nordicom.

Juska, Arunas (2007): “Discourses on Rurality in Post-Socialist News Media: The Case of Lithuania’s Leading Daily ‘Lietuvos Rytas’ (1991–2004)”, Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 238–253. [Read this Article]

Kline, Ronald R. (2000): Consumers in the Country: Technology and Social Change in Rural America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lefebvre, Henri (1974/1991): The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lundby, Knut (2009): “Introduction: ‘Mediatization’ as Key”, Knut Lundby (ed.): Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences, New York: Peter Lang.

McKenzie, Stephen (2004): Social Sustainability: Towards Some Definitions, Magill: Working Paper No 27, Hawke Research Institute.

Moores, Shaun (2004): “The Doubling of Place: Electronic Media, Time-Space Arrangements and Social Relationships”, Nick Couldry & Anna McCarthy (eds): Mediaspace: Place, Scale and Culture in a Media Age, London: Routledge.

Moores, Shaun (2008): “Conceptualizing Place in A World of Flows”, Andreas Hepp, Friedrich Krotz, Shaun Moores & Carsten Winter (eds): Connectivity, Networks and Flows: Conceptualizing Contemporary Communications, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Morley, David (2007): Media, Modernity and Technology: The Geography of the New, London: Routledge.

Park, Sam Ock (2004): “Knowledge, Networks and Regional Development in the Periphery in the Internet Era”, Progress in Human Geography, 28:3, 283–286. [Read this Article]

Putnam, Robert D. (2000): Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Sassen, Saskia (2001): The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (Second Edition), Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press.

Scott, Kathryn, Julie Park & Chris Cocklin (2000): “From ‘Sustainable Rural Communities’ to ‘Social Sustainability’: Giving Voice to Diversity in Mangakahia Valley, New Zealand’, Journal of Rural Studies, 16:4, 433–446. [Read this Article]

Scannell, Paddy (2006): Radio, Television and Modern Life: A Phenomenological Approach, Oxford: Blackwell.

Short, Brian (2006): “Idyllic Ruralities”, Paul Cloke, Terry Marsden & Patrick Mooney (eds): Handbook of Rural Studies, London: Sage. 

Silverstone, Roger, Eric Hirsch & David Morley (1992): “Information and Communication Technologies and the Moral Economy of the Household”, Roger Silverstone & Eric Hirsch (eds): Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, London: Routledge.

Tomlinson, John (1999): Globalization and Culture, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Tomlinson, John (2001): Instant access: Some cultural implications of ’globalising’ Technologies, University of Copenhagen: Global Media Cultures Working Paper No 13.

Tomlinson, John (2008): “’Your Life – To Go’: The Cultural Impact of New Media Technologies”, Andreas Hepp, Friedrich Krotz, Shaun Moores & Carsten Winter (eds): Connectivity, Networks and Flows: Conceptualizing Contemporary Communications, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Tönnies, Ferdinand (1887/2001): Community and Civil Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Urry, John (2003): “Social Networks, Travel and Talk”, British Journal of Sociology, 54:2, 155–175.Urry, John (2007): Mobilities, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Wittel, Andreas (2001): “Toward a Network Sociality”, Theory, Culture & Society, 18:6, 51–76.

Woods, Michael (2007): “Engaging the Global Countryside: Globalization, Hybridity and the Reconstitution of Rural Place”, Progress in Human Geography, 31:4, 485–507. [Read this Article]

Zimmerman Umble, Diane (2003): “Sinful Network or Divine Service: Competing Meanings of the Telephone in Amish Country”, Lisa Gitelman & Geoffrey B. Pingree (eds): New Media 17401915. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2010-06-11

How to Cite

Jansson, A. (2010) “Mediatization, Spatial Coherence and Social Sustainability: The Role of Digital Media Networks in a Swedish Countryside Community”, Culture Unbound, 2(2), pp. 177–192. doi: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.10211177.

Issue

Section

Theme: Rural Media Spaces