Celebrating the International, Disremembering Shanghai: The Curious Case of the Shanghai International Film Festival
Keywords:Shanghai International Film Festival (SIFF), festival programming, “being international/internationalization” (guojihua), global city, cosmopolitanism
The state-sanctioned Shanghai International Film Festival (SIFF) is the only film festival accredited by the Fédération Internationale des Associations de Producteurs de Films (FIAPF) in the Greater China region. This paper intends to explore the perceived paradoxes of the SIFF by approaching its vaguely defined vision of “being international/internationalization” (or guojihua). The vision of guojihua has, at best, fuelled the persistent efforts of the SIFF to emulate the globally standardized festival framework and redirect the global capital flow into its newly installed film market. On the other hand, the SIFF has been reluctant to use one of its most precious cultural legacies – the cosmopolitanism of the Republican era – as a branding resource. The main argument is that the weakened connection between the SIFF and its locality/cultural memory is not only a result of the superficial understanding of guojihua, but also of the fact that the central and the local government often hold conflicting ideas regarding the social engineering of Shanghai’s image.
Abbas, Ackbar (2000): “Cosmopolitan De-scriptions: Shanghai and Hong Kong”, Public Culture, 12: 3, 769-786. [Read this article]
Berry, Chris (2009): “Bigger than Ever: The 12th Shanghai International Film Festival”, Senses of Cinema, Issue 52, June: http://www.sensesofcinema.com/2009/issue-52/bigger-than-ever-the-12th-shanghai-international-film-festival/ (accessed 08/2010)
Berry, Chris (2011): “International Film Festivals And The Rise Of Chinese Transborder Cinema”, speech to the International Postgraduate Conference, 26 May, New Generation Chinese Cinema: Commodities Of Exchange, King’s College, London.
Braester, Yomi (2005): “‘A Big Dying Vat’: The Vilifying of Shanghai during the Good Eighth Company Campaign”, Modern China, 31: 4, 411–447. [Read this article]
Braester, Yomi (2008): “The Political Campaign as Genre: Ideology and Iconography during the Seventeen Years Period”, Modern Languages Quarterly, 69: 1, 119–140. [Read this article]
Chen, Wenping & Jifu Cai (2007): 100 Years of Shanghai Cinema (Shanghai dian ying 100 nian), Shanghai: Shanghai Culture Press.
China Daily (2008): “Shanghai Film Fest a Far Cry From Cannes”, 25 June: http://en.cnci.gov.cn/HtmlFiles/News/2008-6-25/4874.html (accessed 15/07/2011).
Cremin, Stephen (2011). “A Tale of Two Festivals”, Film Business Asia, 28 April: http://www.filmbiz.asia/news/a-tale-of-two-festivals (accessed 02/05/2011).
De Valck, Marijke (2007): Film Festivals: From European Geopolitics to Global Cinephilia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [Read this article]
Elsaesser, Thomas (2005): European Cinema: Face To Face With Hollywood, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [Read this article]
Iordanova Dina (2006): “Showdown of the Festivals: Clashing Entrepreneurships and Post-Communist Management of Culture", Film International, 4:5, Issue 23, 25-38.
Law, Kar (1994): “introduction”, Cinema of Two Cities: Hong Kong-Shanghai, Hong Kong International Film Festival, 10-16.
Lee, Leo Ou-fan (1999): "The Urban Milieu of Shanghai Cinema, 1930-40: Some Explorations of Film Audience, Film Culture, and Narrative Conventions", Yingjin Zhang (eds): Cinema and Urban Culture in Shanghai, 1922-1943, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 74-96.
McGrath, Jason (2008): Postsocialist Modernity : Chinese Cinema, Literature, andCriticism in the Market Age, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mollet, Phyllis (2002): “It Is A-Category Rather Than A-Class: As FIAPF Clarified”, Beijing Youth Daily, 15 June: http://ent.sina.com.cn/m/f/2002-06-15/87546.html (accessed 05/2011).
Ong, Aihwa & Li Zhang (2008): “Introduction: Privatizing China: Powers of the Self, Socialism from Afar”, Aihwa Ong & Li Zhang (eds): Privatizing China, Socialism from Afar, Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 1-20.
Peranson, Mark (2009): “First You Get the Power, Then You Get the Money: Two Models of Film Festivals”, Richard Porton (eds): On Film Festivals, London, New York: Wallflower, 23-37.
SMEG (2006): the Five-Year Plan for Shanghai TV Festival and the Shanghai International Film Festival, [inner circulated material], Shanghai: SMEG.
Stringer, Julian E. (2002): “Global Cities and the International Film Festival Economy”, Mark Shiel & Tony Fitzmaurice (eds): Cinema and the City: Film and Urban Societies in a Global Context, Oxford, New York: Blackwell Publishing, 134-144.
Tang, Lijun et al. (2006): On The Brandnaming Strategies And Positioning Of SIFF, [Inner Circulated Material], Shanghai: Shanghai International Film Festival.
Tang, Lijun (2009): “Executive Vice Secretary of SIFF Responding to the Media’s Questions”, SINA.COM.CN, 24 June: http://ent.sina.com.cn/c/2009-06-24/18042579862.shtml (accessed 08/2010).
Tuinsta, Fons (2008): “Can Shanghai Host An International Event”, China Herald, 15 June: http://www.chinaherald.net/2008/06/can-shanghai-host-international-event.html (accessed 15/07/2008).
Zhang, Yingjin (eds) (1999): “Introduction”, Cinema and Urban Culture in Shanghai, 1922-1943, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 3-26.
Zhao, Jing & Weier Mu (2009): “No Films but only the festival”, SINA.COM.CN, 22 June: http://ent.sina.com.cn/m/f/2009-06-22/00122574697.shtml (accessed 15/07/2009).
Zhou, Zhenhua et al. (2010) Shanghai, The Transformation Of The City And its Prospects (Shanghai: Chengshi shanbian ji zhanwang), October, Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2012 Ran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.