Database Documentary: From Authorship to Authoring in Remediated/Remixed Documentary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124327Keywords:
Database documentary, documentary film, authorship, remediationAbstract
The engagement with documentary from its inception as a film form is frequently a set of references to documentary auteurs. The names of Flaherty, Grierson, Vertov and later Ivens, Leacock and Rouch are immediate signifiers of whole documentary film practices. These practices have given rise to histories and criticism that have dominated discussion of documentary and provided the foundation for more nuanced thinking about problems of the genre. One of the seminal texts in the field, Documentary by Erik Barnouw (1974) celebrates the auteur as the structuring principle for his historical review of documentary. It may be a reflection of the influence of this book, that so much of documentary criticism reflects the auteur approach as a starting point for analysis.
The shift towards a new documentary format, the Database Documentary, challenges the concept of an auteur in its presentation of documentary materials. This format relies on a remediation technique that recalibrates documentary media within new distributive networks supported by the web and enhanced by converged and designed visual and sonic interfaces. The reception modalities are necessarily removed from the familiar forms of projection and presentation of documentary film and television.
The research focus for this paper is how the concept of authorship (the “auteur”) is transformed by the emergence of the relatively new screen format of the database documentary.
The paper reviews some of the more recent examples of Database Documentary, the contexts for their production and the literature on new conceptions of documentary knowledge that may be drawn from these examples. An analysis of the authoring program, Korsakow and the documentaries that have been made using its software will demonstrate the route documentary has travelled from authorship to authoring in contemporary media production.
References
Barnouw, Eric (1974): Documentary: A History of the Non-fiction Film, London: Oxford University Press.
Bolter, Jay & Richard Grusin (2000): Remediation: Understanding New Media, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Burnett, Ron (2005): How Images Think, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cohen Hart, Juan Salazar & Iqbal Barkat (2009): Screen Media Arts: An Introduction to Concepts and Practices, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Downing, John (2007): “Grassroots Media: Establishing Priorities for the Years Ahead”, Global Media Journal/ Australian Edition, 1:1: http://stc.uws.edu.au/gmjau/2007_1_toc.html (accessed 09/12/22).
Ellis, Jack & Betsy A. McLane (2005): A New History of Documentary Film, New York: Continuum.
Flew, Terry (2008): New Media: An Introduction, London: Oxford University Press. Hartwig, Gunthar, (2001): “New Media Documentary: Explorations in the Changing Form, Theory and Practice of Documentary in The Computer as an Expressive Medium”, Stephen Mamber and Eugene Thacker (eds): The Computer as an Expressive Medium: http://www.gunthar.com/gatech/digital_documentary/Database_Documentary.pdf (accessed 12/03/30).
Jenkins, Henry (2007): Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York: NYU Press.
Kinder, Marsha, (2008): “The Conceptual Power of On-Line Video: Five Easy Pieces”, Geert Lovink & Sabine Niederer (eds): Video Vortex Reader: Responses to YouTube, Amsterdam: INC. 53 – 62.
Manovich, Lev (2001): The Language of New Media, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Manovich, Lev (2005): “Remixability”: www.manovich.net, (accessed 09/12/22).
Manovich, Lev (2006): “After Effects, of Velvet Revolution. PART 2”: http://manovich.net/DOCS/ae_article_part2.doc (accessed 12/03/30).
Manovich, Lev (2008): “Software Takes Command”, www.manovich.net (accessed 09/12/22).
Metz, Christian, (1974): Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema, London: Oxford University Press.
Miles, Adrian, (2008): “Programmatic Statements for a Facetted Videography”, Geert Lovink & Sabine Niederer (eds): Video Vortex Reader: Responses to YouTube, Amsterdam: INC. 223- 230
McMillan Sally J., (2002): “Exploring Models of Interactivity From Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents and Systems”, Sonja Livingston & Leah H. Lievrouw (eds): The Handbook of New Media, London, Sage, 205-229.
Servaes, Jan, Thomas L. Jacobson & Shirley A. White (1996): Participatory Communication for Social Change, London: Sage.
Theall, Donald (1976): The Medium is the Rear-View Mirror: Understanding McLuhan, Toronto: U. of Toronto Press.
Wagmeister, Fabian (2000): “Modular Visions: Referents, Context and Strategies for Database Open Media Works”, AI & Society”, The Journal of Human-Centred and Machine Intelligence, 14: www.vv.arts.ucla.edu/AI_Society/wagmister.html (accessed 12/01/30).
Williams, Raymond (1977): Marxism and Literature, London: Oxford University Press.
Database Documentary
Almost Architecture http://www.almostarchitecture.com/
Fragments http://korsakow.org/fragments-adrian-miles
Life After Wartime http://lifeafterwartime.com/
Korsakow http://korsakow.org/
Labyrinth Project http://college.usc.edu/labyrinth/about.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Cohen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.
