Keywords:Funny numbers, history of mental hospitals, history of statistics, standardization of statistics, statistics of mental illness, technicality, thin description
The struggle over cure rate measures in nineteenth-century asylums provides an exemplary instance of how, when used for official assessments of institutions, these numbers become sites of contestation. The evasion of goals and corruption of measures tends to make these numbers “funny” in the sense of becoming dishonest, while the mismatch between boring, technical appearances and cunning backstage manipulations supplies dark humor. The dangers are evident in recent efforts to decentralize the functions of governments and corporations using incen-tives based on quantified targets.
Beck, Theodric Romeyn (1830): “Statistical Notices of some of the Lunatic Asylums in the United States,” Transactions of the Albany Institute, vol. 1, part I, 60-83.
Bevan, Gwyn & Christopher Hood (2006): “What’s Measured Is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health System,” Public Administration, 84, 517-538.
Committee appointed to Examine the Physicians who have attended His Majesty During His Illness, Touching the present State of His Majesty’s Health (1789): Report, Ordered to be printed 13th January 1789.
Dahl, Ludvig Vilhelm (1859) Bijdrag til Kundskab om de Sindssyge i Norge, Christiania: Det Steenske Bogtrykkeri.
Desrosières, Alain (1993): La politique des grands nombres: Histoire de la raison statistique, Paris: La Découverte.
Desrosières, Alain (2004): “Managing the Economy”. Theodore M. Porter & Dorothy Ross, (eds): The Cambridge History of Science, volume 7: Modern Social Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press, 553-564.
Earle, Pliny (1886/1887): The Curability of Insanity: A Series of Studies,Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company, Study First.
Greene, Jeremy (2007): Prescribing by Numbers: Drugs and the Definition of Disease, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hacking, Ian (1990): The Taming of Chance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hood, Christopher (1991): “A Public Management for all Seasons”, Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
Holst, Frederik (1828): Beretning, Betankning og Indstilling fra en til at undersøge de Sindsvages Kaar i Norge og gjøre Forslag til deres Forbedring i Aaret 1825 naadigst nedsat Kongelig Commission. Med en Samling af Tabeller og tvende Tavler i Steentruk, Christiania: Trykt hos Jacob Lehmanns Enke.
Jorland, Gerard, Annick Opinel & George Weisz, (eds) (2005): Body Counts: Medical Quantification in Historical and Sociological Perspective, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2005.
Latour, Bruno (1997): Science in Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Marks, Harry (1997): The Progress of Experiment: Science and Therapeutic Reform in the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matthews, J. Rosser (1995): Quantification and the Quest for Medical Certainty, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Porter, Theodore M. (1986): The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820-1900, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Porter, Theodore M. (1995): Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Porter, Theodore M. (2003): “The Social Sciences”, David Cahan (ed.): From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 254-290.
Porter, Theodore M. (2009): “How Science Became Technical,” Isis, 100, 292-309.
Porter, Theodore M. (2012a) “Quantity and Polity: Asylum Statistics and the Drive for Medical Evidence”, Jed Z. Buchwald (ed.) (2012): A Master of Science History: Essays in Honor of Charles Coulston Gillispie, New York: Springer, 327-340.
Porter, Theodore M. (2012b): “Thin Description: Surface and Depth in Science and Science Studies”, Robert E. Kohler & Kathryn M. Olesko (eds): Clio Meets Science: The Challenge of History, Osiris, 27, 209-226.
Prichard, James Cowles (1835): A Treatise on Insanity and Other Disorders Affecting the Mind,London: Sherwood, Gilbert, and Piper.
Rottenburg, Richard (2009): Far-Fetched Facts: A Parable of Development Aid, Allison Brown and Tom Lampert (trans.) Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Rusnock, Andrea (2001): Vital Accounts: Quantifying Health and Population in Eighteenth-Century England and France, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
State Lunatic Hospital (1851): Nineteenth Annual Report of the Trustees of the State Lunatic Hospital at Worcester, Boston: Dutton and Wentworth, State Printers, Report of the Trustees.
Copyright (c) 2012 Porter
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.