Perfume Packaging, Seduction and Gender

Authors

  • Magdalena Petersson McIntyre Centre for Consumer Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.135291

Keywords:

Consumption, perfume, seduction, packaging, gender, shop-along, agency

Abstract

This article examines gender and cultural sense-making in relation to perfumes and their packaging. Gendered meanings of seduction, choice, consumption and taste are brought to the fore with the use of go-along interviews with consumers in perfume stores. Meeting luxury packages in this feminized environment made the interviewed women speak of bottles as objects to fall in love with and they de-scribed packages as the active part in an act of seduction where they were expecting packages to persuade them into consumption. The interviewed men on the other hand portrayed themselves as active choice-makers and stressed that they were always in control and not seduced by packaging. However, while their ways of explaining their relationship with packaging on the surface seems to confirm cultural generalizations in relation to gender and seduction, the article argues that letting oneself be seduced is no less active than seducing. Based on a combination of actor network theories and theories of gender performativity the article points to the agency of packaging for constructions of gender and understands the inter-viewees as equally animated by the flows of passion which guide their actions.

References

Abelson, Elaine (1989): When Ladies go-a-thieving, New York: Oxford University Press.

Arvastsson, Gösta och Ehn, Billy (red.) (2009): Etnografiska observationer, Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Barad, Karen (2003): “Posthumanst Performativity”, Signs. 28:3, 801-831. DOI: 10.1086/345321

Belk, Russel (1995): “Collecting as Luxury Consumption”, Journal of Economic Psychology,16:3, 477-490. DOI: 10.1016/0167-4870(95)98956-X

Breazeale, Kenon (2000): “In Spite of Women”, Jennifer Scanlon (ed.): The Gender and Consumer Culture Reader, New York: New York University Press.

Butler, Judith (1990): Gender Trouble, New York/London: Routledge.

Butler, Judith (1997): Excitable Speech, New York/London: Routledge.

Butler, Judith (1993): Bodies that Matter,New York/London: Routledge.

Bücher, Monica & John Urry (2009): ‘Mobile Methods and the Empirical”, European Journal of Social Theory. 12:1, 99-116. DOI: 10.1177/1368431008099642

Bäckman, Maria (2009): ”Se med andras ögon”, Gösta Arvastsson & Billy Ehn (eds): Etnografiska observationer, Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Cochoy, Franck (2004): “Is the Modern Consumer a Buridan’s Donkey?”, Helene Brembeck & Karin M. Ekström (eds): Elusive Consumption, Oxford: Berg.

Cochoy, Franck (2007): “A Brief Theory of the Capitation of the Public”, Theory, Culture & Society, 24:7-8, 213-233.

Cochoy, Franck (2012): “In Datamatrix Veritas”, Barbara Czarniawska& Orvar Löfgren (eds): Managing Overflow, Routledge: New York.

Cooren, Francois (2010): Action and Agency in Dialogue, Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Cronin, Anne M. (2000): Advertising and Consumer Citizenship, London: Routledge.

Felski, Rita (1995): The Gender of Modernity, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Freeman, Cynthia A. (2011): “Share the Fantasy”, Fritz Allhoff (ed.): Fashion Philosophy for Everyone, Oxford: Blackwell.

Ganetz, Hillevi (2005): ”Damernas Paradis?”, Tora Friberg & Carina Listerborn (eds): Speglingar av rum, Stockholm/Stehag: Symposion.

Gundle, Stephen & Clino Castelli (2006) The Glamour System: New York: MacMillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230510456

Hemme, Dorothee (2010): “Harnessing Daydreams”, Ethnologia Europaea,40:1.

Hine, Thomas (1997): The Total Package, London: Little, Brown and company.

Kjellmer, Viveka (2009): Doft i bild,Göteborg : Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

Kusenbach, Margarethe (2003): “Street Phenomenology”, Ethnography, 4:3, 455–485. DOI: 10.1177/146613810343007

Latour, Bruno (1996): Aramis or the Love of Technology, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno (2005): Reassembling the Social, New York. Oxford University Press.

Lipovetsky, Gilles (1994): The Empire of Fashion, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Nava, Mica (1995): “Modernity’s Disavowal”, Mica Nava & Alan O’Shea (eds): Modern Times, London: Taylor and Francis.

Miller, Daniel (1998): A Theory of Shopping, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Mort, Frank (1996): Cultures of Consumption, London: Routledge.

Partington, Angela (1996): “Perfume, Pleasure and Post-modernity”, Pat Kirkham (ed.): The Gendered Object, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Scanlon, Jennifer (ed.) (2000): The Gender and Consumer Culture Reader. New York: New York University Press.

Schroeder, Jonathan (2002): Visual Consumption, London and New York: Routledge.

Schroeder, Jonathan & Janet Borgerson (2003): “Dark Desires”, Tom Reichert & Jacqueline Lambiase (eds): Sex in Advertising, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schroeder, Jonathan & Detlev Zwick (2004): “Mirrors of Masculinity”, Consumption, Markets and Culture, 7:1, March 2004, 21–52.

Solander, Tove (2010): “Signature Scents”, Senses & Society, 5:3, 301-321. DOI: 10.2752/174589210X12753842356007

Twitchell, James (2002): Living it Up, New York: Columbia University Press.

Downloads

Published

2013-06-12

How to Cite

Petersson McIntyre, M. (2013) “Perfume Packaging, Seduction and Gender”, Culture Unbound, 5(2), pp. 291–311. doi: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.135291.

Issue

Section

Theme: Feminist Cultural Studies