Cultural Governance and the Crisis of Financial Capitalism
Keywords:Cultural policy, creative society, neo-liberalism, democracy crisis, capitalism
Cultural policies in Europe were designed, albeit in significantly different ways national and ideological lines, as an additional component of the Welfare State. They were supposed to bring about democracy in cultural consumption by removing the obstacles on the road to giving access to symbolic goods. Since the ‘80s and the neo-liberal turn, this democratic imperative has declined, and was even labeled a complete failure, and new goals for cultural policy emerged: developing the conditions for a creative society, supporting city branding, and encouraging private sponsorship. This change in political justification created new contradictions and some disenchantment among the professionals who were, in growing numbers, employed in the cultural sector. The current crisis of capitalism has two main consequences. Shrinking budgets add new limits on cultural policy as culture tends to be identified as a “supplement of soul” when basic needs are no longer addressed and new claims for full democratic access to cultural resources.
Alexander Victoria D. (2007): “State Support of Artists: The Case of the United Kingdom in a New Labour Environment and Beyond”, Journal of Arts Management Law and Society, 37:3, 185-200. DOI: 10.3200/JAML.37.3.185-200
Biass, Sophie & Jean-Louis Fabiani (2011): “Marseille: A City beyond Distinction?”, Nottingham French Studies, 50, Spring 2011, 83-94. DOI: 10.3366/nfs.2011.008
Bonet, Lluís & Fabio Donato (2011): “The Financial Crisis and its Impact on the Current Models of Governance and Management of the Cultural Sector in Europe”, ENCATC Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, 1:1, 4-11.
Boltanski Luc (2011): On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Boltanski, Luc & Eve Chiapello (1999/2005): The New Spirit of Capitalism, London: Verso.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE 2011 Results of a 2011 Survey with Governments on Culture Budgets and the Financial Crisis and Culture. Strasbourg. Publication of Council of Europe.
Dubois, Vincent (2013): La culture comme vocation, Paris: Raisons d’agir.
EUROSTAT 2011 Cultural statistics. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Fabiani J.L.’s (2011): “Review of Luc Boltanski’s On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation”, European Journal of Sociological Theory, 14, 401-406. DOI: 10.1177/1368431011412352
Florida, Richard (2002): The Rise of the Creative Class, New York: Basic Books.
Foucault Michel (1978): Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London: Penguin Books.
Hardt, Michael & Antonio Negri (2000): Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Inkei, Péter (2010): “The Effects of the Economic Crisis on Culture”, Culture Watch urope conference 2010 “Culture and the Policies of Change” EESC Headquarters, Brussels, 6-7 September.
McGuigan, Jim (2004): “The Cultural Public Sphere”, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8, 427-443. DOI: 10.1177/1367549405057827
McGuigan, Jim (2011): “The Cultural Public Sphere: A Critical Measure of Public Culture?”, Gerard Delanty, Liana Giorgi & Monica Sassatelli (eds): Festivals and the Cultural Public Sphere, London: Routledge.
Menger, Pierre Michel (1999): “Artistic Labor Markets and Careers”, Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 542-543. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.541
Menger, Pierre Michel (2002): Portrait de l'artiste en travailleur, Paris, Le Seuil.
Menger, Pierre Michel (2009): Le Travail créateur, Paris, EHESS-Gallimard-Seuil.
Mulcahy, Kevin V. (2006): “Cultural Policy: Definitions and Theoretical Approaches”, The Journal of Arts, Management, Law and Society, 35:4, 319-330. DOI: 10.3200/JAML.35.4.319-330
Nye, Joseph S. (2004): Soft Power: The Means To Success in World Politics, New York, Public Affairs.
Shockley, Gordon E. (2011): “Political Environment and Policy Change: The National Endowment for the Arts in the 1990s”, The Journal of Arts, Management, Law and Society, 41;4, 267-284. DOI: 10.1080/10632921.2011.628232
Schuster, J. Mark (2003): Mapping State cultural Policy: The State of Washington, Chicago: University of Chicago, Cultural Policy Center.
Copyright (c) 2014 Fabiani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.