A Stitch in Time: Changing Cultural Constructions of Craft and Mending

Authors

  • Anna König University of Arts, London, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.135569

Keywords:

Mending, domestic work, gender, sustainability, labour, leisure, skills

Abstract

Over the course of the twentieth century, the availability of cheap, mass-produced fashion has contributed to a decline in everyday domestic mending skills. Indeed, as mass-manufactured goods have become cheaper for the global population it has become normative consumer behaviour to dispose of any item that is less than perfect, even when the damage is entirely superficial, leading Clark to claim that: ‘mending has died out’ (2008: 435).

However, in recent years there has been an apparent revival in domestic mending, aided and evidenced by the emergence of sewing and mending groups in the UK, mainland Europe and North America. This has coincided with a growing interest in more sustainable material goods (McDonough & Braungart 2002; Fletcher 2008), and a small body of academic work around the notion of craftsmanship (e.g. Sennett 2008; Crawford 2009). Of particular interest here is the history of mending of clothing and household goods, as well as recent incarnations of mending as both an individual and group activity. In the past year, researchers from diverse theoretical backgrounds have also highlighted the role of mending in everyday material goods providing further insights into the subject (Laitala & Boks 2012; Middleton 2012; Portwood-Stacer 2012).

An examination of mending reveals a complex picture in which gender, class, aesthetics and social motivations interweave with the imperatives of consumer culture. Whilst historically it is generally constructed as a feminine activity, and carried connotations of material deprivation, contemporary mending is often motivated by environmental concerns and a desire to reduce consumption. Ultimately, mending is demonstrated to be an under-researched subject loaded with cultural meaning, and ultimately, is shown to be anything but a trivial activity.

References

Appignanesi, Lisa (2008): Mad, Bad and Sad: A History of Women and the Mind Doctors from 1800 to the Present. London: Virago.

Barker, Hannah & Jane Hamlett (2010): ‘Living Above the Shop: Home, Business, and family in the English “Industrial Revolution”’, Journal of Family History, 35:4, 311-328. London: Sage.

Baudrillard, Jean (1970): The Consumer Society: Myths and Structure, London: Sage.

Bocock, Robert (1995): Consumption, London: Routledge.

Burman, Barbara (ed.) (1999): The Culture of Sewing, Oxford: Berg.

Campbell, Julie A. & Brenda Brandt (1994): ‘“No Seamstresses, No Ready-Made Clothing” Clothing Consumption on the American Frontier, 1850-1890’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12:3, 16-21.

Clark, Hazel (2008): ‘SLOW + FASHION – an Oxymoran – or a Promise for the Future...?’ Fashion Theory Ecofashion Special Issue, 12:4, 427-446.

Crawford, Matthew (2009): The Case for Working with your Hands, London: Penguin.

Fletcher, Kate (2008): Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys, London: Earthscan.

Gauntlett, David (2011): Making is Connecting. Cambridge: Polity.

Gibson, Chris & Elyse Stanes (2011): ‘Is Green the New Black? Exploring Ethical Fashion Consumption’, Talia Lewis & Emily Potter (eds): Ethical Consumption: A Critical Introduction, London: Routledge.

Gordon, Beverly (1992): ‘Meanings in Mid-Nineteenth Century Dress: Images from New England Women’s Writings’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10:3, 44-53.

Honoré, Carl (2005): In Praise of Slow, London: Orion.

Kumarappa, Joseph Cornelius (1958): Economy of Permanence, Raj Ghat Kashi: Sarva-Seva Sangh.

Laitala, Kirsi & Casper Boks (2012): ‘Sustainable Clothing Design: Use Matters’ J. Design Research, Volume 10:1/2. 121-139.

Lemire, Beverly (2005): ‘Shifting Currency: The Culture and Economy of the Second Hand Trade in England c.1600-1850’, Alexandra Palmer & Hazel Clark (eds): Old Clothes, New Looks, Oxford: Berg.

McDonough, William & Michael Braungart (2002): Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, New York: North Point Press.

Middleton, Jonnet (2012): ‘Long Live the Thing! Temporal Ubiquity in a Smart Vintage Wardrobe’ Ubiquity: The Journal of Pervasive Media, 1:1, 7-22.

Portwood-Stacer, Laura (2012): ‘Anti-consumption as Tactical Resistance: Anarchists, Subculture and Activist Strategy’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 12:1. 87-105.

Schofield-Tomschin, Sherry (1999): ‘Home Sewing: Motivational Changes in the Twentieth Century’, Barbara Burman (ed.): The Culture of Sewing, Oxford: Berg.

Schumacher, Ernst Friedrich (ed.) (1993): Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered, London: Vintage.

Sennett, Richard (2008): The Craftsman, London: Penguin.

Sharpe, Katherine (2012): ‘Sip Lattés and Fix Busted Stuff at the Repair Café’, Wired, 31 May 2012: http://www.wired.com/design/2012/05/fixer-collectives/ (accessed 30 November 2012).

Websites

http://mymakedoandmendyear.wordpress.com/

http://repaircafe.nl/

http://scrapiana.com/

http://therestartproject.org/

http://tomofholland.com/

Downloads

Published

2013-12-12

How to Cite

König, A. (2013) “A Stitch in Time: Changing Cultural Constructions of Craft and Mending”, Culture Unbound, 5(4), pp. 569–585. doi: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.135569.

Issue

Section

Theme: Pursuing the Trivial