What do we Think an Encyclopaedia is?
Keywords:Encyclopaedias, publishing, reference books, information-seeking behavior, book history
The death of the encyclopaedia is increasingly reported in connection with the abandonment of hard copy reference publishing, the dispersal of library reference collections and the preference for end-users to seek information from search engines and social media. Yet this particular form of the book evolved in a very specific way to meet the needs of knowledge-seekers, needs which persist and perhaps flourish in an age of information curiosity. This article uncovers what is meant by ‘encyclopaedia’ by those who produce and use them. Based on survey and interview research carried out with publishers, librarians and higher education students, it demonstrates that certain physical features and qualities are associated with the encyclopaedia and continue to be valued by them. Having identified these qualities, the article then explores whether they apply to three incidences of electronic encyclopaedias, Britannica Online, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Wikipedia. Could it be that rather than falling into obsolescence, their valued qualities are being adopted by online forms of knowledge provision?
Adams, Thomas R. & Nicolas Barker (1993): ‘A New Model for the Study of the Book’, Nicolas Baker (ed): A Potencie of Life: Books in Society, London: British Library, 5-43.
Attwooll, David (1986): ‘Developing a List of Reference Books’, Scholarly Publishing, July, 317-326.
Barzun, Jacques (1962): ‘Notes on the Making of a World Encyclopaedia’, American Behavioral Scientist, 6:1, 7-14. DOI: 10.1177/000276426200600102
Blair, Ann (2010): Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bolter, J. & Grusin, Richard A. (2000). Remediation: Understanding New Media, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bookseller (2011): ‘Rule Britannica’, The Bookseller, 3 June 2011, 24.
Bond, Gwenda (2008): ‘Fighting Facts and Figures’, Publishers Weekly, 255:19, 12 May 2008, 26-30.
Bradford, Jane (2005): ‘What’s Coming Off the Shelves: A Reference Use Study Analyzing Print Reference Sources used in a University Library’, Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31:6, 546-558. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2005.08.007
Britannica (2013): ‘About Us’, Britannica Online, http://corporate.britannica.com/about/ (accessed 24 September 2013).
Cassell, Kay Ann & Hiremath, Uma (2009): Reference and Information Services in the 21st Century (2nd Edition), London: Facet Publishing.
Danford, Nathalie (2009): ‘The Lonely Stand of Print Reference’, Publishers Weekly, 256:19, 11 May 2009, 26-30.
Darnton, Robert (1979): The Business of Enlightenment: A Publishing History of the Encyclopédie 1775-1800, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Darnton, Robert (1982): ‘What is the History of Books?’, Daedalus, 111:3, 65-83.
Darnton, Robert (1990): The Kiss of Lamourette: Reflections in Cultural History, New York: W.W. Norton.
Einbinder, Harvey (1964): Myth of the ‘Britannica’, London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1964.
Featherstone, Mike & Couze Venn (2006): ‘Problematizing Global Knowledge and the New Encyclopaedia Project: An Introduction’, Theory Culture Society, 23:2/3, 1-20. DOI: 10.1177/0263276406065779
Finkelstein, David & Alistair McCleery (2005): An Introduction to Book History, New York: Routledge.
Genette, Gerard (1997): Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, Jane E. Lewin (trans), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giles, Jim (2006): ‘Internet Encyclopaedias go Head to Head’, Nature, 438, 900-901. DOI: 10.1038/438900a
Haider, Jutta & Olof Sundin (2010): ‘Beyond the Legacy of the Enlightenment? Online Encyclopaedias as Digital Heterotopias’, First Monday, 15:1, http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2744 (accessed 07 June 2013).
Heintzelman, Nicole, Courtney Moore & Joyce Ward (2008): ‘Are Reference Books Becoming an Endangered Species’, Public Libraries, 47:5, 60-64.
Howsam, Leslie (2006): Old Books and New Histories: An Orientation to Studies in Book and Print Culture, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Jones, Philip (2008): ‘Eulogy for Encyclopedias’, The Bookseller, 17 March 2008.
McKenzie, Donald F. (1985): Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts (The Panizzi lectures), London: British Library.
O’Gorman, Jack & Barry Trott (2009): ‘What will Become of Reference in Academic and Public Libraries?’, Journal of Library Administration, 49:4, 327-339. DOI: 10.1080/01930820902832421
Publishers Weekly (2009): ‘The Reference View’, Publishers Weekly, 256:40, 5 October 2009, 10-11.
Radway, Janice (1984): Reading the Romance, Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
Shores, Louis (1939): Basic Reference Books: An Introduction to the Evaluation, Study and Use of Reference Materials with Special Emphasis on Some 300 Titles, Chicago: American Library Association.
Stevens, Norman (1987): ‘Evaluating Reference Books in Theory and Practice’, Bill Katz & Robin Kinder (eds): The Publishing and Review of Reference Sources, London: Haworth, 9-19.
Stockwell, Foster (2000): A History of Information Storage and Retrieval, Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2013): ‘About the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/about.html (accessed 24 September 2013).
Sundin, Olof & Jutta Haider (2013): ‘The Networked Life of Professional Encyclopaedias: Quantification, Tradition and Trustworthiness’, First Monday, 18:6, http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4383 (accessed 06 June 2013). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v18i6.4383
Van Doren, Charles (1962): ‘The Idea of an Encyclopedia’, American Behavioral Scientist, 6:1, 23-26. DOI: 10.1177/000276426200600105
Wikipedia (2013a): ‘Wikipedia: About’, Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopaedia, 22 September 2013: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:About&oldid=574049890, (accessed 24 Sepember 2013).
Wikipedia (2013b): ‘Wikipedia: What Wikipedia is Not’, Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopaedia, 24 September 2013: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not&oldid=574324642, (accessed 24 September 2013).
Wikipedia (2013c): ‘Editorial Team / Assessment’, Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopaedia, 7 September 2013: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment&oldid=571907135, (accessed 24 September 2013).
Wikipedia (2013d): ‘Categorization’, Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopaedia, 18 September 2013: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categorization&oldid=573569988, (accessed 24 September 2013).
Wright, Alex (2007): Glut: Mastering Information through the Ages, Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Yeo, Richard (2001): Encyclopaedic Visions: Scientific Dictionaries and Enlightenment Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2014 Schopflin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.