Knowledge and the Systematic Reader: The Past and Present of Encyclopedic Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146505Keywords:
Systematic reading, encyclopedism, encyclopedias, Encyclopædia Britannica, Enlightenment, knowledge production, history of readingAbstract
Though digital media have unquestionably affected the features and functions of modern encyclopedias, such works also continue to be shaped by factors thoroughly conventional by the end of the historical Enlightenment. As William Smellie, editor of the first Encyclopædia Britannica (1768-71) wrote, “utility ought to be the principal intention of every publication. Wherever this intention does not plainly appear, neither the books nor their authors have the smallest claim to the approbation of mankind.” The “instructional designers” and “user-experience specialists” of the online Britannica are the inheritors of all those authors and editors who before and after Smellie’s time devised different plans and methods intended to maximize the utility of their works. The definition of utility and with it the nature of encyclopedic knowledge continues to change both because of and despite technological difference; if digitization has in some ways advanced the ideals of Enlightenment encyclopedias, then it has in other ways allowed for the re-inscription of certain flaws and limitations that encyclopedias like the Britannica were specifically designed to overcome. By examining not only what one might read in the encyclopedia but also the ways in which one might read it, this article demonstrates the extent to which the notion of encyclopedic utility depends on historical context.
References
A Compendium of Physic, and Surgery: For the Use of Young Practitioners (1769). London.
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1630): Encyclopædia septem tomis distincta, 4 vols., Herbornæ Nassoviorum.
Baldwin, James (1899): A Guide to Systematic Readings in the Encyclopædia Britannica, Chicago: Werner Company.
Barrow, John (1751): A New and Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, London.
Barrow, John (1754): A Supplement to the New and Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, London.
Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation and Access (2010): Sustainable Economics for a Digital Planet: Ensuring Long-Term Access to Digital Information, http://brtf.sdsc.edu/biblio/BRTF_Final_Report.pdf (accessed 10 July 2013).
Britannica Today, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., http://corporate.britannica.com/about/today/ (accessed 08 July 13).
Chambers, Ephraim (1728): Cyclopædia, London.
Chartier, Roger (2004): “Languages, Books, and Reading from the Printed Word to the Digital Text”, Teresa Lavender Fagan (trans), Critical Inquiry, 31, 133-52. DOI: 10.1086/427305
Creech, James (1982): “‘Chasing after Advances’: Diderot's Article ‘Encyclopedia’”, Yale French Studies, 63: 183-97. DOI: 10.2307/2929839
De Coetlogon, Dennis (1745): An Universal History of Arts and Sciences, London.
Deletionpedia, http://deletionpedia.dbatley.com/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=1403798 (accessed 18 February 2014).
Diderot, Denis (1956): “The Encyclopædia”, Rameau's Nephew and Other Works, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 277-308.
Educational Learning Books and Encyclopedias, The Britannica Store: http://www.britannica.com/store/educational-learning-books.html, (accessed 08 July 2013).
Engelsing, Rolf (1974): Der Burger als Leser. Lesergeschichte in Deutschland 1500-1800, Stuttgart: J. B. Metzlersche and A. E. Poeschel.
Gardner, Sue (2013): “What’s Missing from the Media Discussions of Wikipedia Categories and Sexism”, Wikimedia Blog, http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/05/01/of-wikipedia-categories-and-sexism/ (accessed 06 January 2014).
Gervais, Bertrand (2008): “Is There a Text on This Screen? Reading in an Era of Hypertextuality”, Susan Schreibman & Ray Siemens (eds): A Companion to Digital Literary Studies, Oxford: Blackwell, 183-202.
Goldsmith, Oliver (1764): An History of England, in a Series of Letters from a Nobleman to His Son, 2 vols., London.
Haider, Jutta & Olof Sundin (2010): “Beyond the Legacy of the Enlightenment? Online Encyclopaedias as Digital Heterotopias”, First Monday, 15:1, http://firstmonday.org/article/viewArticle/2744/2428 (accessed 08 July 2013).
Hall, William Henry (1791): The New Royal Encyclopedia, Thomas Lloyd (ed), 2nd ed.: London.
Howard, George Selby (ed) (1788): The New Royal Cyclopædia, and Encyclopædia, or Complete, Modern and Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, 3 vols., London.
Hume, Robert D. (2006): “The Economics of Culture in London 1660-1740”, The Huntington Library Quarterly, 69:4, 487-533. DOI: 10.1525/hlq.2006.69.4.487
Kafker, Frank (1994): “Smellie’s Edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica”, Frank Kafker (ed): Notable Encyclopedias of the Late 18th Century: Eleven Successors of the Encyclopédie, Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 145-82.
Live Blog (2013): Supreme Court to Rule on Gay Marriage, Washington Wire - WSJ: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/06/26/live-blog-supreme-court-to-rule-on-gay-marriage/ (accessed 27 June 2013).
Loveland, Jeff (2012): “Why Encyclopedias Got Bigger…and Smaller”, Information and Culture,47:2, 233-54. DOI: 10.1353/lac.2012.0012
Macfarquhar, Colin & George Gleig (eds) (1797): Encyclopædia Britannica, 3rd ed., 20 vols., Edinburgh.
McCormack, Patricia (1968): “Inquisitive Sorts Keep Girls Busy”, The News and Courier, 10 October 1968, 2-C.
Meta Contributors (2013): “Association of Deletionist Wikipedians”, Meta, discussion about Wikimedia projects, 17 December 2013: http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_of_Deletionist_Wikipedians&oldid=6764342, (accessed 06 January 2014).
Meta Contributors (2014): “Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians”, Meta, Discussion about Wikimedia Projects, 3 January 2014: http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_of_Inclusionist_Wikipedians&oldid=6939662, (accessed 06 January14).
Moretti, Franco (2000): “Conjectures on World Literature”, New Left Review, 1, 54-68.
Peacham, Henry (1622): The Compleat Gentleman, London.
The Penny Magazine of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge (1838): “The Orang-outan”, 3 February 1838, 41-4.
Proposals for Printing, by Subscription, a Work, Intitled, Encyclopædia Britannica; or, A New and Complete Dictionary of Arts and Sciences (1768): Edinburgh.
Shackleton, Robert (1984): “The Encyclopædic Spirit”, Paul J. Korshin & Robert R. Allen (eds): Greene entennial Studies: Essays Presented to Donald Greene, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 377-90.
Shneidman, Edwin (1998): ‘Suicide on My Mind, Britannica on My Table’, The American Scholar, 67:4, 93-104.
Smellie, William (ed) (1771): Encyclopædia Britannica, 1st ed., 3 vols., Edinburgh.
Speedy Deletion Wiki, http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Speedy_deletion_Wiki (accessed 18 February 2014).
Submission Guidelines, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., http://corporate.britannica.com/submission.html#article (accessed 18 February 2014).
Sullivan, Lawrence (1990): “Circumscribing Knowledge: Encyclopedias in Historical Perspective”, The Journal of Religion,70:3, 315-59. DOI: 10.1086/488406
Swift, Jonathan (1973): “A Tale of a Tub”, Robert A. Greenberg and William B. Piper (eds): The Writings of Jonathan Swift, New York: Norton.
Tytler, James (ed) (1778): “Acoustics”, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2nd ed., 10 vols., Edinburgh, 1:56-6
Valenza, Robin (2009): “How Literature Becomes Knowledge: A Case Study”, ELH 76, 215-45. DOI: 10.1353/elh.0.0037
Vandendorpe, Christian (2008): “Reading on Screen: the New Media Sphere”, Ray Siemens and Susan Schreibman (eds): A Companion to Digital Literary Studies, Oxford: Blackwell, 203-15.
Weller, Toni (2008): “Preserving Knowledge Through Popular Victorian Periodicals: An Examination of The Penny Magazine and the Illustrated London News, 1842-1843”, Library History, 24:3, 200-207. DOI: 10.1179/174581608X348087
Wikipedia Contributors (2013): “Make Technical Articles Understandable”, Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, 30 September 2013: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Make_technical_articles_understandable&oldid=575181081, (accessed 14 November 2013).
Wikipedia Contributors (2014): “What Wikipedia is Not”, Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, 6 January 2014: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not&oldid=589429742 (accessed 06 January 2014).
Yeo, Richard (2001): Encyclopedic Visions: Scientific Dictionaries and Enlightenment Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yeo, Richard (2007): ‘Lost Encyclopedias: Before and after the Enlightenment’, Book History 10: 47-68.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Rudy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.
