The Free Encyclopaedia that Anyone can Edit: The Shifting Values of Wikipedia Editors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146593Keywords:
Wikipedia, encyclopaedias, encyclopaedism, mass collaboration, in-ternet studies, grounded theory, online communityAbstract
Wikipedia is often held up as an example of the potential of the internet to foster open, free and non-commercial collaboration. However such discourses often conflate these values without recognising how they play out in reality in a peer-production community. As Wikipedia is evolving, it is an ideal time to examine these discourses and the tensions that exist between its initial ideals and the reality of commercial activity in the encyclopaedia. Through an analysis of three failed proposals to ban paid advocacy editing in the English language Wikipedia, this paper highlights the shift in values from the early editorial community that forked encyclopaedic content over the threat of commercialisation, to one that today values the freedom that allows anyone to edit the encyclopaedia.
References
Alexa (2014): ALEXA Top 500 global Sites, http://www.alexa.com/topsites, (accessed 26 January 2014).
Benkler, Yochai (2006): The Wealth of Networks, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bruns, Axel. (2008): Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond, New York: Peter Lang.
Charmaz, Kathy (2006): Constructing Grounded Theory, London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Chartered Institute of Public Relations (2012): Wikipedia Best Practice Guidelines for Public Relations Professionals: http://www.cipr.co.uk/sites/default/files/CIPR_Wikipedia_Best_Practice_Guidance.pdf, (accessed 26 January 2014).
Coleman, E.Gabriella (2013): Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Van Dijck, José (2013): The Culture of Connectivity, New York: Oxford University Press. DPO_ 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001
Distaso, Marcia W. (2012): ‘Measuring Public Relations Wikipedia Engagement : How Bright is the Rule?’, Public Relations Journal, 6:2.
Galvez, Michael (2010): ‘Translating Wikipedia’, Google Official Blog, http://googleblog.blogspot.com.au/2010/07/translating-wikipedia.html (accessed 10 January 2014).
Garber, Megan (2011): ‘The Contribution Conundrum: Why Did Wikipedia Succeed While Other Encyclopedias Failed?’, Nieman Journalism Lab, http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/10/the-contribution-conundrum-why-did-wikipedia-succeed-while-other-encyclopedias-failed/ (accessed 29 November 2013).
Gillespie, Tarleton (2010): ‘The Politics of “Platforms”’, New Media & Society, 12:3, 347–364. DOI: 10.1177/1461444809342738
Greenstein, Shane & Feng Zhu (2012): ‘Is Wikipedia Biased?’, American Economic Review, 102:3, 343–348. DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.3.343
Haider, Jutta & Olof Sundin (2010): ‘Beyond the Legacy of the Enlightenment? Online Encyclopaedias as Digital Heterotopias’, First Monday, 15:1, http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2744/2428 (accessed 10 January 2014).
Halfaker, Aaron. et al. (2012): ‘The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System: How Wikipedia’s Reaction to Popularity Is Causing Its Decline’, American Behavioral Scientist, 57:5, 664–688.
Halfaker, Aaron, Aniket Kittur & John Riedl (2011): ‘Don’t Bite the Newbies: How Reverts Affect the Quantity and Quality of Wikipedia Work’, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis, 163–172. DOI: 10.1177/0002764212469365
Kittur, Aniket, Bongwon Suh, Bryan A. Pendleton & Ed H. Chi (2007): ‘He Says, she Says: Conflict and Coordination in Wikipedia’, CHI ’07 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: ACM, 453–462.
Laniado, David & Riccardo Tasso (2011): ‘When the Wikipedians talk: Network and Tree Structure of Wikipedia Discussion Pages’, Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, The AAAI Press, 177–184.
Leadbeater, Charles (2006): ‘Are you Thinking what I’m Thinking?’, The Times, http://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/319621080 (accessed 6 May 2013).
Lessig, Lawrence (2008): Remix, New York: The Penguin Press.
Lih, Andrew (2009): The Wikipedia Revolution, New York: Hyperion.
Lovink, Geert (2011): Networks Without a Cause, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Matei, Sorin Adam & Caius Dobrescu (2010): ‘Wikipedia’s “Neutral Point of View”: Settling Conflict through Ambiguity’, The Information Society, 27:1, 40–51. DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2011.534368
Mullin, Joe (2014): ‘Wikimedia Foundation Employee Ousted Over Paid Editing’, Ars Technica, http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/01/wikimedia-foundation-employee-ousted-over-paid-editing/ (accessed 11 January 2014).
Owens, Simon (2013): ‘The Battle to Destroy Wikipedia’s Biggest Sockpuppet Army’, The Daily Dot, http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/wikipedia-sockpuppet-investigation-largest-network-history-wiki-pr/ (accessed 1 December 2013).
Park, Jane (2010): ‘Wikipedia on New Facebook Community Pages’, Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/21721 (accessed 1 December 2013).
Roth, Matthew (2013): ‘Wikimedia Foundation Sends Cease and Desist Letter to WikiPR’, Wikimedia Blog, http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/11/19/wikimedia-foundation-sends-cease-and-desist-letter-to-wikipr/ (accessed 20 November 2013).
Sanger, Larry (2006): ‘The Early History of Wikipedia and Nupedia: A Memoir’, Chris DiBona, Danese Cooper & Mark Stone (eds): Open Sources 2.0, Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.
Shirky, Clay (2008): Here Comes Everybody, London: The Penguin Press.
Song, Sonya Yan & Steven S. Wildman (2013): ‘Evolution of Strategy and Commercial Relationships for Social Media Platforms: The Case of YouTube’, Mike Friedrichsen & Wolfgang Mühl-Benninghaus (eds): Handbook of Social Media Management, Berlin: Springer, 619–632.
Tapscott, Don & Anthony D. Williams (2006): Wikinomics, New York: Portfolio.
Tkacz, Nathaniel (2011): The Spanish Fork: Wikipedia’s Ad-Fuelled Mutiny, http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-01/20/wikipedia-spanish-fork (accessed 15 October 2012).
Tkacz, Nathaniel (2010): ‘Wikipedia and the Politics of Mass Collaboration*', PLATFORM: Journal of Media and Communication, 2:2, 40–53.
Wikimania (2013): Submissions/How Could Companies Help Reach Wikimedia Strategic Goals? 18 January 2014: http://wikimania2013.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Submissions/How_could_companies_help_reach_Wikimedia_strategic_goals%3F&oldid=26700 (accessed 7 February 2014).
Wikimedia Foundation (2013a): Communications Committee/Press Clippings/2013 Wiki-PR Coverage, 25 November 2013: http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Communications_committee/Press_clippings/2013_Wiki-PR_coverage&oldid=6508489 (accessed 10 December 2013).
Wikimedia Foundation (2013b): Press Releases/Sue Gardner Statement Paid Advocacy Editing, 24 October 2013: http://wikimediafoundation.org/w/index.php?title=Press_releases/Sue_Gardner_statement_paid_advocacy_editing&oldid=94021 (accessed 10 December 2013).
Wikimedia Foundation (2013c): Wikimedia Foundation Sends Cease and Desist Letter to WikiPR, http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/11/19/wikimedia-foundation-sends-cease-and-desist-letter-to-wikipr/ (accessed 1 December 2013).
Wikipedia (2013a): Wikipedia: Conflict of Interest Limit, 10 December 2013: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest_limit&oldid=585490686 (accessed 1 February 2014).
Wikipedia (2013b): Wikipedia: No Paid Advocacy, 27 November 2013: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:No_paid_advocacy&oldid=583555825 (accessed 1 February 2014).
Wikipedia (2013c): Wikipedia: Paid Editing Policy Proposal, 10 December 2013: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Paid_editing_policy_proposal&oldid=585490537 (accessed 1 February 2014).
Wikipedia (2013d): Wikipedia: Ten Things You May Not Know About Wikipedia, 12 February 2014: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Ten_things_you_may_not_know_about_Wikipedia&oldid=595107058 (accessed 12 February 2014).
Wikipedia (2014a): Wikipedia:Benutzerverifizierung, 29 January 2014: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Benutzerverifizierung&oldid=126994163 (accessed 7 February 2014).
Wikipedia (2014b): Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, 27 January 2014: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view&oldid=592691843 (accessed 8 February 2014).
Wikipedia (2013e): Wikipedia:Notability, 12 February 2014: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Notability&oldid=595078884 (accessed 12 February 2014).
Wikipedia (2012): Wikipedia: Wikipedia Signpost/2012-10-01/Paid editing, The Signpost, 3 October 2012: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-10-01/Paid_editing&oldid=515822228 (accessed 15 November 2013).
Yeo, Richard (2001): Encyclopaedic Visions: Scientific Dictionaries and Enlightenment Culture, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Osman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.
