The Nature of Society: Enmapping Nature, Space and Society into a Town-green Hybrid
Keywords:Hybrid, actor-network, space, power, informal, urban
The paper describes the transformation of derelict land into a ‘town-green’ and the role legislation played in transforming social and natural relationships. Town-green denotes a legal status under the Great Britain Commons Act (2006) that protects certain open spaces from building development; the status requires that a space must simultaneously have a specific social quality (i.e. ‘town-ness’) and a specific natural quality (i.e. ‘green-ness‘). This hybrid condition requires an alliance between society and nature in a certain configuration (referred to here as nature2 and society2). In this empirical study it involved the participation and consensus of local residents, volunteer gardeners as well as nature itself; flowers needed to bloom and grass had to grow in order for the hybrid town-green status to be conferred. There are two distinct phases of this transformation; the first is the change in identities and configuration of the constituents of town and green. This involved the production of a modified ‘real’ world with: different plants and flowers; reconfigured spatial arrangements; as well as different social actors. The second phase is a shift from changes in the ‘real’ world towards an ‘enmap’ – a displacement of myriad actors into documentation. This transfer from a complex messy reality into an enmap permitted the legitimation of the new network to be accepted as a ‘town-green’. What the research reveals, other than hints for gardeners and community activists, is how material and non-material; social and natural; spatial, discursive and temporal worlds are hybridised.
Albertsen, Niels & Bulent Diken (2000): What is the Social? Lancaster: Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.
BBC (2008): ‘Town Green Plan for Castle Park’, http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/bristol/hi/people_and_places/nature/newsid_7758000/7758064.stm 1 December 2008: (accessed 03 February 2010).
Bhabha, Homi K. (1994): The Location of Culture, Oxon: Routledge.
Bourdieu, Pierre & Terry Eagleton (1992): ‘Doxa and Common Life’, New Left Review, 191, 111-121.
Callon, Michel (1986): ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay’, John Law (ed.): Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, London: Routledge, 196-233.
Callon, Michel (1991): ‘Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility’, John Law (ed.): A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: Routledge, 132-161.
Callon, Michel & John Law (1995): ‘Agency and the Hybrid Collectif’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 94:2, 481-507.
Castells, Manuel (1997): The Rise of the Network Society. Volume 1, Oxford: Blackwell.
Oxford English Dictionary (1993): The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Edensor, Tim (2005): Industrial Ruins: Space, Aesthetics and Materiality, Oxford: Berg.
Elam, Mark (1999): ‘Living Dangerously with Bruno Latour in a Hybrid World’, Theory, Culture & Society, 16:4, 1-24. DOI: 10.1177/02632769922050692
Foucault, Michel (1980): Two Lectures’, Colin Gordon (ed): Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977, New York: Pantheon Books, 78-108.
Graf, Heike (2014): ‘From Wasteland to Flower Bed’, Culture Unbound, 6:23, 451–471. DOI: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146451
Great Britain. Commons Act (2006): www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006, (accessed 10 November 2011).
Hall, Stuart (1993): ‘Cultural Identity and Diaspora’, Patrick Williams & Laura Chrisman (eds): Colonial Discourse and Postcolonial Theory: A Reader, Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 233-246.
Haraway, Donna (2008): When Species Meet, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Harrison, Brigid Callahan (2011): Power and Society: An Introduction to the Social Sciences, Boston: Wadsworth.
Hennion, Antoine (1989): ‘An Intermediary between Production and Consumption: the Producer of Popular Music’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 14:4, 400-424. DOI: 10.1177/016224398901400405
Latour, Bruno (1986): ‘Visualisation and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands’, Knowledge and Society, 6, 1-40.
Latour, Bruno (1992): ‘Where are the Missing Masses? Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts’,Wiebe Bijke & John Law (eds): Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press, 225-258.
Latour, Bruno (1993): We have Never been Modern, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (1996): Aramis: Or the Love of Technology, Harvard: Harvard Press.
Law, John (1986): Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Law, John (1999): After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology, John Law & John Hassard (eds): Actor Network Theory and After, Oxford: Blackwell.
Lee, Stuart & Roth, Wolf-Michael (2001): ‘How Ditch and Drain Become a Healthy Creek: Re-Presentations, Translations and Agency During the Re/Design of a Watershed’, Social Studies of Science, 31:3, 315-356. DOI: 10.1177/030631201031003001
Mavrommatis, George (2010): ‘A Racial Archaeology of Space: A Journey Through the Political Imaginings of Brixton and Brick Lane, London’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36:4, 561-579. DOI: 10.1080/13691830903398862
Michael, Mike (1998): ‘Co(a)gency and the Car: Attributing Agency in the Case of the “Road Rage”’, Brita Brenna, John Law & Ingunn Moser (eds): Machines, Agency and Desire, Oslo: TMV, 125-141.
Preda, Alex (1999): ‘The Turn to Things’, The Sociological Quarterly, 40:2, 347-366. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb00552.x
Rice, Louis (2011): ‘Black-Boxing Sustainability’, Journal of Sustainable Development, 4:4, 32-37. DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v4n4p32
Said, Edward, W. (1994): Culture and Imperialism, New York: Vintage.
Saldanha, Arun (2006): ‘Reontologising Race: The Machinic Geography of Phenotype’, Environment and Planning D, 24:1, 9-24.
Serres, Michel (2007): The Parasite, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Soja, Edward W. (1996): Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places, Oxon: Blackwell.
Star, Susan Leigh & James R. Griesemer (1989): ‘Institutional Ecology, Translations and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39’, Social Studies of Science, 19:3, 387-420. DOI: 10.1177/030631289019003001
Tironi, Manuel (2012): ‘Gelleable Spaces, Eventful Geographies: The Case of Santiago’s Experimental Music Scene’, Ignacio Farías & Thomas Bender (eds): Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies, Oxon: Routledge, 27-52.
Weber, Max (1997): The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, New York: Free Press.
Westwood, Sallie (2002): Power and the Social, London: Routledge.
Wilson, James Quinn & George Kelling (1982): ‘The Police and Neighborhood Safety: Broken Windows’, Atlantic Monthly, 3:127, 29-38.
Copyright (c) 2014 Rice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.