The Nature of Society: Enmapping Nature, Space and Society into a Town-green Hybrid

Authors

  • Louis Rice University of England, Bristol, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146981

Keywords:

Hybrid, actor-network, space, power, informal, urban

Abstract

The paper describes the transformation of derelict land into a ‘town-green’ and the role legislation played in transforming social and natural relationships. Town-green denotes a legal status under the Great Britain Commons Act (2006) that protects certain open spaces from building development; the status requires that a space must simultaneously have a specific social quality (i.e. ‘town-ness’) and a specific natural quality (i.e. ‘green-ness‘). This hybrid condition requires an alliance between society and nature in a certain configuration (referred to here as nature2 and society2). In this empirical study it involved the participation and consensus of local residents, volunteer gardeners as well as nature itself; flowers needed to bloom and grass had to grow in order for the hybrid town-green status to be conferred. There are two distinct phases of this transformation; the first is the change in identities and configuration of the constituents of town and green. This involved the production of a modified ‘real’ world with: different plants and flowers; reconfigured spatial arrangements; as well as different social actors. The second phase is a shift from changes in the ‘real’ world towards an ‘enmap’ – a displacement of myriad actors into documentation. This transfer from a complex messy reality into an enmap permitted the legitimation of the new network to be accepted as a ‘town-green’. What the research reveals, other than hints for gardeners and community activists, is how material and non-material; social and natural; spatial, discursive and temporal worlds are hybridised.

References

Albertsen, Niels & Bulent Diken (2000): What is the Social? Lancaster: Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.

BBC (2008): ‘Town Green Plan for Castle Park’, http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/bristol/hi/people_and_places/nature/newsid_7758000/7758064.stm 1 December 2008: (accessed 03 February 2010).

Bhabha, Homi K. (1994): The Location of Culture, Oxon: Routledge.

Bourdieu, Pierre & Terry Eagleton (1992): ‘Doxa and Common Life’, New Left Review, 191, 111-121.

Callon, Michel (1986): ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay’, John Law (ed.): Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, London: Routledge, 196-233.

Callon, Michel (1991): ‘Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility’, John Law (ed.): A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: Routledge, 132-161.

Callon, Michel & John Law (1995): ‘Agency and the Hybrid Collectif’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 94:2, 481-507.

Castells, Manuel (1997): The Rise of the Network Society. Volume 1, Oxford: Blackwell.

Oxford English Dictionary (1993): The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Edensor, Tim (2005): Industrial Ruins: Space, Aesthetics and Materiality, Oxford: Berg.

Elam, Mark (1999): ‘Living Dangerously with Bruno Latour in a Hybrid World’, Theory, Culture & Society, 16:4, 1-24. DOI: 10.1177/02632769922050692

Foucault, Michel (1980): Two Lectures’, Colin Gordon (ed): Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977, New York: Pantheon Books, 78-108.

Graf, Heike (2014): ‘From Wasteland to Flower Bed’, Culture Unbound, 6:23, 451–471. DOI: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146451

Great Britain. Commons Act (2006): www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006, (accessed 10 November 2011).

Hall, Stuart (1993): ‘Cultural Identity and Diaspora’, Patrick Williams & Laura Chrisman (eds): Colonial Discourse and Postcolonial Theory: A Reader, Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 233-246.

Haraway, Donna (2008): When Species Meet, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

Harrison, Brigid Callahan (2011): Power and Society: An Introduction to the Social Sciences, Boston: Wadsworth.

Hennion, Antoine (1989): ‘An Intermediary between Production and Consumption: the Producer of Popular Music’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 14:4, 400-424. DOI: 10.1177/016224398901400405

Latour, Bruno (1986): ‘Visualisation and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands’, Knowledge and Society, 6, 1-40.

Latour, Bruno (1992): ‘Where are the Missing Masses? Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts’,Wiebe Bijke & John Law (eds): Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press, 225-258.

Latour, Bruno (1993): We have Never been Modern, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno (1996): Aramis: Or the Love of Technology, Harvard: Harvard Press.

Law, John (1986): Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Law, John (1999): After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology, John Law & John Hassard (eds): Actor Network Theory and After, Oxford: Blackwell.

Lee, Stuart & Roth, Wolf-Michael (2001): ‘How Ditch and Drain Become a Healthy Creek: Re-Presentations, Translations and Agency During the Re/Design of a Watershed’, Social Studies of Science, 31:3, 315-356. DOI: 10.1177/030631201031003001

Mavrommatis, George (2010): ‘A Racial Archaeology of Space: A Journey Through the Political Imaginings of Brixton and Brick Lane, London’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36:4, 561-579. DOI: 10.1080/13691830903398862

Michael, Mike (1998): ‘Co(a)gency and the Car: Attributing Agency in the Case of the “Road Rage”’, Brita Brenna, John Law & Ingunn Moser (eds): Machines, Agency and Desire, Oslo: TMV, 125-141.

Preda, Alex (1999): ‘The Turn to Things’, The Sociological Quarterly, 40:2, 347-366. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb00552.x

Rice, Louis (2011): ‘Black-Boxing Sustainability’, Journal of Sustainable Development, 4:4, 32-37. DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v4n4p32

Said, Edward, W. (1994): Culture and Imperialism, New York: Vintage.

Saldanha, Arun (2006): ‘Reontologising Race: The Machinic Geography of Phenotype’, Environment and Planning D, 24:1, 9-24.

Serres, Michel (2007): The Parasite, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Soja, Edward W. (1996): Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places, Oxon: Blackwell.

Star, Susan Leigh & James R. Griesemer (1989): ‘Institutional Ecology, Translations and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39’, Social Studies of Science, 19:3, 387-420. DOI: 10.1177/030631289019003001

Tironi, Manuel (2012): ‘Gelleable Spaces, Eventful Geographies: The Case of Santiago’s Experimental Music Scene’, Ignacio Farías & Thomas Bender (eds): Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies, Oxon: Routledge, 27-52.

Weber, Max (1997): The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, New York: Free Press.

Westwood, Sallie (2002): Power and the Social, London: Routledge.

Wilson, James Quinn & George Kelling (1982): ‘The Police and Neighborhood Safety: Broken Windows’, Atlantic Monthly, 3:127, 29-38.

Downloads

Published

2014-10-01

Issue

Section

Independent Articles