From Autonomy to Anonymity: Information Technology Policy and Changing Politics of the Media System in Indian Democracy

Authors

  • Aasim Khan Visiting Professor, IIIT Delhi PhD Candidate, King's College London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.2018103405

Keywords:

Media System, India, Autonomy, Anonymity, Technology, Policy

Abstract

The prominence of information and communications technology (ICTs) in defining India’s media modernity can be gauged by the growing reach of online social media as well as continuing expansion of digital media channels and satellite broadcasting even in the early 21stCentury. Policies concerning information technologies, from telegraph to satellite networks, have also been central to media politics and with the rise of new media, internet related policies have similarly become pivotal to the interaction between the state and media system. Drawing from a comparative media system perspective, this paper argues that while there has been no major constitutional or legal overhaul, as yet, new ideas and information technology policy activism are reshaping the contours of state action and ‘autonomy’ of the press in India’s democracy. Comparing technology debates in an earlier era, when satellite networks swept across the media system, with the more recent deliberations around liabilities for digital intermediaries, the paper unpacks the nature of change and locates its origins in the revival of discursive institutions (Schmidt 2002, 2008) of technology policy since the early 2000s. Technology related ideas, I argue, now serve as institutions, able to function as a ‘coordinating discourse’ (ibid) that have revived ideals of an autonomous media. Technology inflected ideals of ‘anonymity’ also counter the ‘communicative discourse’ (ibid) of Hindutva and cultural nationalist politics of media which framed the issue of autonomy in the ascendant phase of print and electronic media capitalism until the 1990s.

Author Biography

Aasim Khan, Visiting Professor, IIIT Delhi PhD Candidate, King's College London

Aasim Khan is a social scientist with an interest in theories of the ‘public sphere,’ digital citizenship and civic media in India. He is also pursuing doctoral research at King’s College London and his thesis focussed on the sociology and politics of communications related rights in India and the impact of the internet. Aasim did his MA from the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), London and also completed MA in Mass Communications from AJK MCRC Jamia Millia Islamia. He did his B.Sc. from St. Stephen’s College in Delhi. Aasim also has over five year work experience as a broadcast journalist and development communciations professional in South Asia and the UK.

References

Abraham, S. (2011) “We are Anonymous, We are Legion”, in The Hindu, April 18, 2011 Acharya, Bhairav (2015): “The Four Parts of Privacy in India,” Economic and Political Weekly, 50(22), 32–38.

Anderson, Benedict (2006): Imagine Communities, London: Verso.

Banaji, Shakuntala (2018): Vigilante publics: orientalism, modernity and Hindutva fascism in India. Javnost - The Public. ISSN 1318-3222 (In Press)

Beland, Daniel (2009): “Ideas, Institutions and Policy Change,” Journal of European Public Policy 16(5), 701-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760902983382

Chandrachud, Abhinav (2017): Republic of Rhetoric: Free Speech and the Constitution of India, New Delhi: Penguin/Viking.

Chaturvedi, Swati (2016): I Am A Troll: Inside the Secret World of the BJP’s Digital Army. New Delhi: Juggernaut.

Committee on Broadcasting and Information Media (1964), Report, Lok Sabha Secretariat, Parliament of India

Evans, Peter (1995): Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Habermas, Jurgen. (1989): The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, (tr. Thomas Burger with Frederick Lawrence) The M. I. T. Press

Hallin, Daniel, & Mancini, Paolo (2004): Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867

Hofheinz, Albrecht (2005): “The Internet in the Arab World: Playground for Political Liberalization” International Politics and Society, 3, 78–96.

Jaffrelot, Christophe (1999): Hindu Nationalism and Indian Politics: Strategies in Identity building, Implantation and Mobilisation, London: Hurst and Company

Jeffrey, Robin (2006): “The Mahatma Didn’t like the Movies and Why it Matters: Indian Broadcasting Policy, 1920s-1990s.” Global Media and Communication, 2(2), 204–224.

Jeffrey, Robin (2009): India’s Newspaper Revolution: Capitalism, Politics and the Indian- language Press. Delhi: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766506066281

Kelty, Christopher (2008): “Geeks, social imaginaries, and recursive publics,” Cultural Anthropology 20(2): 185–214 https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2005.20.2.185

Loynd, Maxine (2006): ‘Politics without Television: The BSP and the Dalit Counter-Public Sphere’. in Television in India: Satellite, Politics and Cultural Change. Mehta, Nalin (ed.), London: Routledge.

Mehta, Nalin (2015): Behind a billion Screens: What Television Tells Us about Modern India. New Delhi: HarperCollins India.

Nair, Kusum (1951), “Press ‘Hartal’ That Did Not Come Off” in The Times of India, 22 July 1951

Narayan, Sunetra (2014): Globalization and Television, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Nihal Singh, S (1980) “A Free Press” in India Today, 30 September 1980.

Ninan, Sevanti (2007). Headlines from the heartland: Reinventing the Hindi public sphere. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9788178299716

Page, David. and Crawley. William (2001): Satellites Over South Asia. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Palshikar, Suhas (2017): Indian Democracy: Oxford India Short Introductions Series. New Delhi: Oxford.

Pickard, Victor (2007): “Neoliberal Visions and Revisions in Global Communications Policy From NWICO to WSIS,” Journal of Communication Inquiry, Sage Publications

Pohle, Julia (2012): “Going Digital: A Historical Perspective on International Cooperation in Informatics.” Frau-Meigs, Divina (eds): From NWICO to WSIS: 30 Years of Communications Geopolitics. Bristol UK: Intellect.

Postil, John (2014): “Freedom Technologists and the New Protest Movements: A Theory of Protest Formulas,” The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 20(4): 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514541350

Raghavan, Vikram (2007). Communications Law in India: Legal Aspects of Telecom, Broadcasting and Cable Services. New Delhi, Lexis Nexis Butterworths

Rajagopal, Arvind (2001): Politics after Television: Hindu Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Public in India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489051

Rajagopal, Arvind (2011): “The Emergency as Prehistory of the New Indian Middle Class,” Modern Asian Studies 45(5): 1003–1049. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X10000314

Rediff.com (2002) “Convergence Bill not before May 03: Mahajan’, Rediff.com, 2 December 2002.

Saeed, Saima (2015): “Phantom Journalism,” Journalism Studies, 16(5), 663-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1054174

Schmidt, Vivien. (2002): “Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment?” Comparative Political Studies, 35: 2, 168-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035002002

Schmidt, Vivien (2008): “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse” Annual Review of Political Science, 11. 3003-306. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342

Sharma, Dinesh (2009): The Long Revolution: The Birth and Growth of India’s IT Industry. New Delhi: Harper Collins India.

Sonwalkar, Prasun (2001): “Opposition to the Entry of the Foreign Press in India, 1991-1995: The Hidden Agenda,” Modern Asian Studies 35(3): 743-763. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X01003092

Sridharan, Eswaran (1996). Political Economy of Industrial Promotion: Indian, Brazilian and Korean Electronics in Comparative Perspective 1969-1994. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

Thomas, Pradeep Ninan (2011) Negotiating Communication Rights: Case Studies from India. New Delhi; Sage Publishing.

The Indian Express (2015) “A little reminder: No one in House debated Section 66A, Congress brought it and BJP backed it” in The Indian Express, March 25, 2015

The Times of India (1964) “Regional Status For ITU Talks: Press Kept out of Meeting” in The Times of India, 16 October 1964

Times of India (1983) “Media in the West bised: PM”, In The Times of India, December 13, 1983

Times of India (1999) “Regarding IT Bill 1999”, Times of India. 12 May 1999.

Trehan, Madhu (2009): Tehelka as Metaphor: Prism Me a Lie Tell Me a Truth, New Delhi: Roli Books.

van Cuilenburg, Jan and McQuail, Dennis (2003): “ Media Policy Paradigm Shifts: Towards a New Communications Policy Paradigm” European Journal of Communication Volume: 18: 2, 181-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323103018002002

Vanaik, Achin (1997). The Rise of Hindu Authoritarianism. New York: Verso.

Zhao, Yuezhi (2011): Understanding Chinas Media System in a World Historical Context,” Hallin, Daniel and Mancinin, Paolo (Eds) Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-13

Issue

Section

Critical Explorations of Media Modernity in India