Inhibited Intentionality and Cultural work: Reconsidering Gender and Female Success

Authors

  • Julie Sommerlund External Relations, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Sara Malou Strandvad Department of Communication, Business and Information Technologies, Roskilde University, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1572271

Keywords:

Creativity, Gender, Creative Industries, Arts, Textiles, Music, Film.

Abstract

In this paper we suggest ways to reconsider the question regarding the relationship gender and creativity. First, we review the theoretical literature on gender and creativity, concluding that the dominant thought is that men are prevalent in making creative achievements, particularly when connected to the notion of ‘genius.’ Second, we review the empirical studies on gender and creativity, a body of literature that comes to the same overall conclusion. Third, we present an empirical case, a Scandinavian design school in which the relationship between gender and creativity is more nuanced, complex, and more dependent on context than both the theoretical and empirical literature would suggest. Based on this case, traits that are often described as hindrances for female agency and creativity are reconsidered. We conclude by suggesting that in certain creative contexts women use their ‘hindrances’ to produce fruitful strategies for overcoming historical gender inequalities, thus turning Iris Young’s classical argument--that women embody limitations--to give a productive and positive account of how women may become successful in creative work.

References

Allen, Kim (2013): ‘”What Do You Need to Make It as a Woman in This Industry? Balls!”: Work Placements, Gender and the Cultural Industries’, Daniel Ashton & Caitriona Noonan (eds): Cultural Work and Higher Education, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 232-253. doi: 10.1057/9781137013941.0019

Alvarez, José Luis & Silviya Svejenova (2005): Sharing Executive Power: Roles and Relationships at the Top, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511488504

Banks, Mark & Katie Milestone (2011): ‘Individualization, Gender, and Cultural Work’, Gender, Work and Organization, 18:1, 73-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00535.x

Barthes, Roland (1968/1990): ‘The Death of the Author’, Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana Press, 142-148.

Battersby, Christine (1989): Gender and Genius: Towards a Feminist Aesthetics, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Bayton, Mavis (1988/1990): ‘How Women Become Musicians’, Simon Frith & Andrew Goodwin (eds): On Record: Rock, Pop and Written Word. Routledge, London, 238-257.

Bilton, Chris & Ruth Leary (2002): ‘What can managers do for creativity? Brokering creativity in the creative industries’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8:1, 49-64. doi: 10.1080/10286630290032431

Boukris, Anne & Henrik Marstal (2010): ‘Musik i ubalance’ (‘Imbalanced Music’). Post from October 22nd, 2010, at the webpage: http://kunstoginterkultur.dk/vidensbase/artikler/musik-i-ubalance-kronik (Accessed 21 October 2011).

Brovall, Sandra (2012): ‘Filmakademi-formand om manglende priser til kvinder: “De sidste 12 år må mændene have været bedre”’ (‘Film academy head about fewer awards to women: “In the last 12 years the men must have been better”’), Politiken, October 9.

Burke, Sean (1992/1998): The Death and Return of the Author: Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida. Second edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Cohen, Sara (1997): ‘Men Making a Scene: Rock music and the production of gender’, Shelia Whiteley (ed.): Sexing the Groove: Popular Music and Gender. London: Routledge, 17-36.

DKDS (2010): Dimittendundersøgelse 2010.

Foucault, Michel (1969/1979): ‘What is An Author?’, Josué V. Harari: Textual Strategies: Per-spectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 141-160.

Frederiksen, Maja Bissenbakker (2006): ‘Ikke et kulturelt kriseråb! – Inklusioner og eksklusioner i debatten om den litterære kanon’. (‘Not a cultural crisis call! Inclusions and exclusions in the debate about the literary canon’), Kvinder, Køn og Forskning, 1, 59-65.

Frith, Simon & Angela McRobbie (1978/1990): ‘Rock and Sexuality’, Simon Frith & Andrew Goodwin (eds.): On Record: Rock, Pop and Written Word. London: Routledge, 371-389.

Ganetz, Hillevi (2011): ‘Fame Factory: Performing Gender and Sexuality in Talent Reality Television’, Culture Unbound, 3, 401–417. doi: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.113401

Gill, Rosalind (2002): ‘Cool, creative and egalitarian? Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Europe’, Information, Communication and Society, 5:1, 70-89. doi: 10.1080/13691180110117668

Goldberg, Philiph (1968): ‘Are Women Prejudiced Against Women,’ Transactions, 5: 28-30. doi: 10.1007/bf03180445

Goldin, Claudia & Cecilia Rouse (1997): ‘Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Audi-tions on Female Musicians’, Working Paper 5903, NBER Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Hustvedt, Siri (2014): The Blazing World, New York: Simon and Schuster.

Huyssen, Andreas (1986): ‘Mass Culture as Woman’, After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 44-62.

Kolding Designskole (2012): Dimittendundersøgelse 2012.

Kulturministeriet, Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannalser og Danmarks Statistik: Beskæftigelsesrapport 2012.

Kristiansen, Annegerd Lerche (2010): ‘Kvinder skal lære at spille instrumenter’ (‘Women have to learn to play instruments’), Politiken, May 23.

Mathiasen, Sofie Birch and Sara Malou Strandvad (2005): ‘Frihed og ufrihed i det kreative arbejde - en undersøgelse af unge danske filminstruktører i et Foucault-perspektiv’ [Freedom and no freedom in creative work—A study of young Danish film directors in a Foucauldian perspective]. Master’s thesis, Department of Sociology, Copenhagen University, Denmark.

McRobbie, Angela (1998): British Fashion Design: Rag Trade or Image Industry. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203168011

McRobbie, Angela (2002): ‘Fashion Culture: Creative Work, Female Individualization’, Feminist Review: Fash-ion and Beauty, 71, 52-62. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400034

McRobbie, Angela (2007): ‘Top Girls? Young women and the post-feminist sexual contract’, Cultural Studies, 21:4-5, 718-737. doi: 10.1080/09502380701279044

Negus, Keith & Michael Pickering (2004): Creativity, Communication and Cultural Value, London: Sage.

Nixon, Sean & Ben Crewe (2004): ‘Pleasure at Work? Gender, Consumption and Work-based Identities in the Creative Industries’, Consumption, Markets and Culture 7:2, 129-147. doi: 10.1080/1025386042000246197

Paludi, Michele A. & William D. Bauer (1983): ‘What’s in an author’s name?’, Sex Roles, 9:3, 387-390. doi: 10.1007/BF00289673

RKU (2014): Beskæftigelsesoversigt 2014.

Sjørup, Karen & Charlotte Kirkegaard (2007): Kvinder i kunst – En undersøgelse af danske kvindelige kunstneres levevilkår 2006-2007. (Women in art – A study of Danish female artists’ conditions of life 2006-2007). Center for Ligestillingsforskning Roskilde Universitetscenter, Udarbejdet for Kunstrådet.

Sommerlund, Julie & Sara Malou Strandvad (2012): ‘The promises of talent: Performing potentiality’), Theory and Psychology, 22:2, 179-195. doi: 10.1177/0959354311432561

Taylor, Stephanie & Karen Littleton (2013): ‘Negotiating a Contemporary Creative Identity’, Daniel Ashton & Caitriona Noonan (eds): Cultural Work and Higher Education, London: Palgrave Macmillan,154-171. doi: 10.1057/9781137013941.0014

Wennes, Grete (2002): Skjønnheten og udyret: Kunsten å lede kunstorganisasjonen. Dissertation submitted to the Department of Strategy and Management at the Norwegian School og Economics and Business. Norges Handelshøyskole.

Young, Iris Marion (1980): ‘Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment, Mobility, and Spatiality’, Human Studies, 3, 137-156. doi: 10.1007/BF02331805

Downloads

Published

2015-06-11