How Green Is This Paper?
Keywords:govermentality, commodification, over-production, scholarly publishing, environmental impact
The increasing governmentalization and commodification of knowledge are putting intense pressure on scholars to write and publish more, and in accordance with conventions that are not of their own making, due to benchmarks of success set by the applied sciences that suit business and the state. These tendencies are also producing a potentially unsustainable environmental burden that may be increasing, not decreasing, as we move more and more into an online publishing world. This recognition leads to three provocations: 1) There is too much scholarly publication to keep up with, and too much pressure to publish; 2) The future of all academic publishing will largely be determined by the sciences; and 3) We must consider the relative merits of publishing electronically rather than on paper in terms of the environment - in other words, asking “how green is this paper?”
‘A Cyber-House Divided’ (2010): Economist, 4 September 2010, 61-62.
ATLAS Collaboration (2010): ‘Charged-Particle Multiplicities in pp Interactions at √s = 900 GeV Measured with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC’, Physics Letters B, 688, 21-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.064
American Society for Cell Biology (2013): San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) http://www.ascb.org/dora/ (accessed 14/12/15).
Bacon, Francis (1854): Novum Organum. Francis Bacon, Selections. The Works, 3 vols. Basil Montague (trans and ed), Philadelphia: Parry & Macmillan.
Beall, Jeffrey (2012) ‘Predatory Publishing’, The Scientist, 1 August 2012: http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32426/title/Predatory-Publishing/.
Campbell, Colin (1985): ‘Torrent of Print Strains the Fabric of Libraries’, New York Times, 25 February 1985: http://www.nytimes.com/1985/02/25/us/torrent-of-print-strains-the-fabric-of-libraries.html?pagewanted=all.
Colquhoun, David (2011): ‘Publish-or-Perish: Peer Review and the Corruption of Science’, Guardian, 5 September 2011: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/sep/05/publish-perish-peer-review-science (accessed 14/12/15).
Dyson, Esther, George Gilder, George Keyworth, & Alvin Toffler (1994): Cyberspace and the American Dream: A Magna Carta for the Knowledge Age, version 1.2, Progress and Freedom Foundation http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/futureinsights/fi1.2magnacarta.html (accessed 14/12/15).
Grossman, Lev (2006): ‘Time’s Person of the Year: You’, Time, 13 December 2006: http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570810,00.html (accessed 14/12/15).
Informa (2015): ‘Informa PLC Full Year Results for 12 Months to 31 December 2014’ http://informa.com/Documents/Investor%20Relations/2015/Full%20Year%202014%20Results/Informa%202014%20Full%20Year%20Results%20Press%20Release.pdf. (accessed 14/12/15).
Kennison, Rebecca & Lisa Norberg (2014): Publishing and Archiving for Humanities and Social Sciences: A White Paper. K/N Consultants http://knconsultants.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/OA_Proposal_White_Paper_Final.pdf (accessed 14/12/15).
Lambert, Craig (2015): ‘The “Wild West” of Academic Publishing’, Harvard Magazine, January-February 2015: http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/01/the-wild-west-of-academic-publishing (accessed 14/12/15).
Maxwell, Richard & Toby Miller (2012): Greening the Media, New York: Oxford University Press.
Maxwell, Richard & Toby Miller (2013): ‘Books: Culture, Economy, Environment’, Joshua S. Hanan & Mark Hayward (eds): Communication and the Economy: History, Value and Agency, New York: Peter Lang, 167-86.
McKenna, Laura (2015): ‘The Convoluted Profits of Academic Publishing’, The Atlantic, 17 December 2015: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/12/the-convoluted-profits-of-academic-publishing/421047/ (accessed 17/12/15).
‘Media Guardian 100’: (2013) Guardian, 2 September 2013: http://www.theguardian.com/media/series/mediaguardian-100-2013.
Miller, Toby (2000): ‘The National Endowment for the Arts in the 1990s: A Black Eye on the Arts?’, American Behavioral Scientist, 43:9, 1429-445. DOI: 10.1177/00027640021955973
Miller, Toby (2012): Blow Up the Humanities, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
National Science Communication Institute (2015): Mapping the Future of Scholarly Publishing http://nationalscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/OSI-report-Feb-2015.pdf (accessed 14/12/15).
Orwell, George (1944): ‘As I Please’, Tribune, 12 May 1944: http://telelib.com/authors/O/OrwellGeorge/essay/tribune/AsIPlease19440512.html (accessed 14/12/15).
Plato (2008): Phaedrus, Benjamin Jowett (trans), Charleston: Forgotten Books.
Qiu, Jane (2010): ‘Publish or Perish in China’, Nature, 463, 142-43. DOI: 10.1038/463142a
Schmitt, Jason (2014): ‘Academic Journals: The Most Profitable Obsolete Technology in History’, Huffington Post 23 December 2014: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jason-schmitt/academic-journals-the-mos_1_b_6368204.html (accessed 14/12/15).
Smart, Pippa (2014): ‘The Big Picture: Scholarly Publishing Trends 2014’, Science Editing, 1:2, 52-57. DOI: 10.6087/kcse.2014.1.52
Stromberg, Joseph (2014): ‘‘Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List’ is an Actual Science Paper Accepted by a Journal’, Vox, 21 November 2014: http://www.vox.com/2014/11/21/7259207/scientific-paper-scam (accessed 14/12/15).
Ware, Mark & Michael Mabe (2015): The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers http://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf (accessed 14/12/15).
World Intellectual Property Organization (2014): ‘US and China Drive International Patent Filing Growth in Record-Setting Year’, http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2014/article_0002.html (accessed 14/12/15).
World Intellectual Property Organization (2015): World Intellectual Property Report: Breakthrough Innovation and Economic Growth: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_944_2015.pdf (accessed 14/12/15).
Copyright (c) 2015 Miller
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.