Neuro-Problems: Knowing Politics Through the Brain

Authors

  • Niklas Altermark Lund University
  • Linda Nyberg Department of Political Science, Lund University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.181031

Keywords:

Neuroscience, neuropolitics, political rationality

Abstract

In recent years, neuroscientific knowledge has been applied far beyond its context of emergence to explain human behaviour in general and to address a host of specific societal problems. In this article, we discuss the emerging research field of ‘neuropolitics’ that seeks to bring neuroscientific methods and findings to political science. Neuropolitics is investigated as a particular way of approaching political problems as located in the brain. We argue that neuropolitics research gives expression to a rationality of government that allows researchers to put forward policy prescriptions based on neuroscientific knowledge. Neuropolitics thus run the risk of leading to what we call a ‘pathologisation of politics’, that turns political problems into biological deviations.

References

Alford, John R., Carolyn L. Funk, & John R. Hibbing (2005): ‘Are political orientations genetically transmitted?’, American Political Science Review, 99:2, 153–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051579

Altermark, Niklas (2014): ‘The ideology of neuroscience and intellectual disability: reconstituting the “disordered” brain’, Disability & Society, 29:9, 1460-1472. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.953244

Altermark, Niklas. (2018): Citizenship Inclusion and Intellectual Disability: Biopolitics Post-Institutionalization, London: Routledge.

Azarian, Bobby (2017): ‘Neuroscience reveals three types of “hidden” Trump voters that the pundits completely missed’, Raw Story, 10 January 2017: http://www. rawstory.com/2017/01/neuroscience-reveals-three-types-of-hidden-trump-voters-that-the-pundits-completely-missed/, (accessed 15/02/18).

Barthes, Roland (1993): Camera Lucida, London: Vintage.

Beaulieu, Anne (2003): ‘Brains, Maps and the New Territory of Psychology’, Theory & Psychology, 13:4, 561–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543030134006

Blank, Robert H. & Samuel M. Hines, Jr (2001): Biology and Political Science, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203201329

Butler, Judith (1993): Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’, New York: Routledge.

Canguilhem, Georges (1991): The Normal and the Pathological, New York: Zone Books.

Charney, Evan. (2008): ‘Genes and Ideologies’, Perspectives on Politics, 6:2, 299-319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592708080626

Dean, Mitchell (2010): Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Fields, Douglas R. (2016a): ‘A Neuroscience Perspective on Brexit: Have a look at Brexit through the lense of a neuroscientist’, Psychology today, 26 June 2016: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-new-brain/201606/neuroscience-per­spective-brexit (accessed 15/02/18).

Fields, Douglas R. (2016b): ‘Trump’s Victory and the Neuroscience of Rage: To understand this election you must understand the brain’s threat detection mechanism’, Scientific American Mind, guest blog, 10 November 2016: https:// blogs.scientificamerican.com/mind-guest-blog/trump-s-victory-and-the-neurosci­ence-of-rage/, (accessed 15/02/18).

Fisher, Mark, David L. Franklin, Jerrod M. Post (2014): ‘Executive dysfunction, brain aging, and political leadership’, Politics and the Life Sciences, 33:2, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.2990/33_2_93

Foucault, Michel (1990): The History of Sexuality: Vol. 1. The Will to Knowledge, Hammondsworth: Penguin.

Fougner, Tore (2008): ‘Neoliberal Governance of States: The Role of Competitive­ness Indexing and Country Benchmarking’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37:2, 303–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097642

Grasso, Marco (2013): ‘Climate Ethics: with a Little Help from Moral Cognitive Neuroscience’, Environmental Politics, 22:3, 377–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.730263

Greene, Joshua D., Brian A. Sommerville, Leigh E. Nystrom, John M. Darley & Jonathan D. Cohen (2001): ‘An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgement’, Science, 293, 2105–08. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872

Greene, Joshua D., Leigh E. Nystrom, Andrew D. Engell, John M. Darley & Jonathan D. Cohen (2004): ‘The Neural Basis of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgement’, Neuron, 44, 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027

Hatemi, Peter K. & Rose McDermott (2012): ‘Broadening Political Psychology’, Political Psychology, 33:1, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00867.x

Holmes, Marcus (2014): ‘International Politics at the Brain’s Edge: Social Neuroscience and a New ‘Via Media’’, International Studies Perspectives, 15, 209–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12012

Inbar, Yoel, David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom (2009): ‘Conservatives are more Easily Disgusted than Liberals’, Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802110007

Jost, John T., Hannah Nam, David M. Amodio & Jay J. Van Bavel (2014): ‘Political Neuroscience: The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship’, Advances in Political Psychology, 35:1, 3–42.

Larner, Wendy & William Walters (2004): ‘Globalisation as Governmentality’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 29: 5, 495-514. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540402900502

Lavazza, Andrea & Mario De Caro (2010): ‘Not so Fast. On Some Bold Neuroscien­tific Claims Concerning Human Agency’, Neuroethics, 3, 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-009-9053-9

Lövbrand, Eva, Johannes Stripple & Bo Wiman (2009): ‘Earth System governmental­ity: Reflections on science in the Anthropocene’, Global Environmental Change, 19, 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.002

McDermott, Rose (2004): ‘The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscientif­ic Advances for Political Science’, Perspectives on Politics, 2: 4, 691-705. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040459

McDermott, Rose (2009): ‘Mutual Interests: The Case for Increasing Dialogue between Political Science and Neuroscience’, Political Research Quarterly, 62: 3, 571-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909336273

Malabou, Catherine (2008): What Should We do With Our Brain, New York: Fordham University Press.

Mountcastle, Vernon B. (2001): ‘Brain Science at the Century’s Ebb’, Jean-Pierre Changeux & Gerald M. Edelman (eds): The Brain, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Nyberg, Linda (2017): Market Bureaucracy: Neoliberalism, Competition, and EU State Aid Policy, Lund: Lund University Faculty of Social Science.

Paterson, Jessica L. (2016): ‘The Cognitive Neuroscience of Fear, or Why Donald Trump Might be President’, The Adelaide Review, 2 November 2016. http:// adelaidereview.com.au/features/science/cognitive-neuroscience-fear-don­ald-trump-might-president/, (accessed 15/02/18).

Pitts-Taylor, Victoria (2010): ‘The plastic brain: Neoliberalism and the neuronal self’, Health (London), 14:6, 635–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459309360796

Racine, Eric; Ofek Bar-Ilan & Judy Illes (2005): ‘FMRI in the Public Eye’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1609

Rose, Nikolas & Miller, Peter (1992): ‘Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government’, The British Journal of Sociology, 43:2, 173–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/591464

Rose, Nikolas (2007): The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827503

Rose, Nikolas (2013): ‘The Human Sciences in a Biological Age’, Theory, Culture Society, 30:1, 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412456569

Sardamov, Ivelin (2007): ‘Burnt into the Brain: Towards a Redefinition of Political Culture’, Democratization, 14:3, 407–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340701303253

Schreiber, Darren (2017): ‘Neuropolitics: Twenty years later’, Politics and the Life Sciences, 36:2, 114 – 31. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2017.25

Schubert, James N., Margaret Ann Curran & Carmen Strungaru (2011): ‘Physical attractiveness, issue agreement, and assimilation effects in candidate appraisal’, Politics and the Life Sciences, 30:1, 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0730938400017664

Sontag, Susan (2002): ‘Looking at War: Photography’s View of Devastation and Death’, The New Yorker, 9 December 2002: https://www.newyorker.com/ magazine/2002/12/09/looking-at-war, (accessed on 15/02/18).

Tusche, Anita, Thorsten Kahnt, David Wisniewski & John-Dylan Haynes (2013): ‘Automatic processing of political preferences in the human brain’, Neuroimage, 72, 174–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.020

Urla, Jacqueline & Jennifer Terry (1995): ‘Introduction: Mapping Embodied Deviance’, Jacqueline Urla & Jennifer Terry (eds): Deviant Bodies, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

van Hiel, Alain, Mario Pandelaere & Bart Duriez (2004): ‘The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 824–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264333

Weisberg, Deena Skolnick, Frank C Keil, Joshua Goodstein, Elizabeth Rawson, & Jeremy R. Gray (2008): ‘The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20:3, 470-7.

Wilson, Elizabeth A. (1999): ‘Melancholic Biology: Prozac, Freud, and Neurological Determinism’, Configurations 7:3, 403–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.1999.0027

Wilson, Edward O. (1998): Consilience: The unity of knowledge, New York, NY: Vintage Books.

Zak, Paul J. & Jacek Kugler (2014): ‘Neuroeconomics and International Studies: A New Understanding of Trust’, International Studies Perspectives, 12, 136–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00424.x

Downloads

Published

2018-04-19

Issue

Section

The Unbound Brain