Life, but not as we know it: A.I. and the popular imagination

Luke Goode

doi:10.3384/cu.2000.1525.2018102185

Authors

Luke Goode University of Auckland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.2018102185

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, robots, futures, singularity, science fiction, media

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence (A.I.) are prompting a growing chorus of both excitement and anxiety. A.I. is widely perceived as a significant emerging and future-shaping technological field that is developing at an accelerating rate. As such, futuristic imagery involving A.I. is increasingly prevalent in popular media. A central task for critical future studies is to assess both positive and problematic aspects of the futuristic scenarios offered up for public consumption, and to evaluate their role as part of a ‘futural public sphere’ (Goode & Godhe 2017). In this paper, I discuss three distinct but interwoven strands of public discourse that each have a role to play in shaping the popular imagination around possible A.I. futures. I begin with a selective discussion of mainstream science fiction represenations. Secondly, I consider several recent and high-profile popular media events surrounding real-world developments in A.I. Finally, I turn to contemporary futurology and, specifically, the discourse of the ‘singularity’ which posits a near future in which artificial ‘superintelligence’ outstrips human cognitive capacities. In this paper I argue that, while much popular coverage of A.I. is sensationalist and potentially misleading, public engagement with a complex, technical subject such as this depends on the circulation of ’evocative stories’ which can act as entry points into public debate. As such, it is important to understand the evocative power of the stories we frequently tell ourselves in popular discourse about A.I. and its role in our future.

Author Biography

Luke Goode, University of Auckland

Luke Goode is Associate Professor of Media and Communication in the School of Social Sciences, University of Auckland.

References

Bartlett, Jamie (2018): The People vs Tech: how the internet is killing democracy, London: Penguin.

Beck, Ulrich (2015): “Emancipatory catastrophism: What does it mean to climate change and risk society?,” Current Sociology, 63:1, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114559951

Bostrom, Nick (2014): Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bridle, James (2018): New Dark Age: Technology and the End of the Future, London: Verso.

Brooks, Rodney (2017): “The Seven Deadly Sins of AI Predictions,” MIT Technology Review, 6 October 2017: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609048/the-sevendeadly-sins-of-ai-predictions/, (accessed 12/06/18).

Capek, Karel (2004 [1921]): R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots) [trans. Claudia Novack-Jones], New York: Penguin Books.

Cellan-Jones, Rory (2016): “Stephen Hawking – will AI kill or save humankind?,” BBC Online, 20 October 2016: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-37713629(accessed 14/07/18).

Colladas, Jose Comacho (2017): “Is AlphaZero really a scientific breathrough in AI?,” 11 December 2017: https://medium.com/@josecamachocollados/is-alphazero-really-a-scientific-breakthrough-in-ai-bf66ae1c84f2, (accessed 20/06/2018).

Davis, Erik (1998): Myth, Magic, and Mysticism in the Age of Information, New York: Harmony Books.

Drexler, Eric (1986): Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology, New York: Doubleday.

Elish, M.C. & boyd, danah (2018) “Situating methods in the magic of Big Data and AI”, Communication Monographs, 85, 57-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1375130

Feeney, Lauren (2011): “Climate change no problem, says futurist Ray Kurzweil,” The Guardian, 21 February 2011: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/feb/21/ray-kurzweill-climate-change, (accessed 20/08/18).

Galeon, Dom and Reedy, Christianna (2017): ‘Kurzweil Claims that the Singularity Will Happen by 2045,’ Futurism, 5 October 2017: https://futurism.com/kurzweilclaims-that-the-singularity-will-happen-by-2045/, (accessed 27/07/18).

Good, I.J. (1965): “Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine,” Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers: https://web.archive.org/web/20010527181244/http://www.aeiveos.com/~bradbury/Authors/Computing/Good-IJ/SCtFUM.html, (accessed 25/06/18).

Goode, Luke and Godhe, Michael (2017): “Beyond Capitalist Realism: Why We Need Critical Future Studies”, Culture Unbound, 9:1, 108-129. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1790615

Gray, John (2011): The Immortalization Commission: Science and the Strange Quest to Cheat Death, London: Allen Lane.

Hanson, David, Olney, Andrew, Pereira, Isma A. & Zielke, Marge (2005): ‘Upending the Uncanny Valley’, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence: aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2005/WS-05-11/WS05-11-005.pdf, (accessed: 20/08/18).

Harari, Yuval Noah (2015): Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow, London: Harvill Secker.

Kelly, Kevin (2016): The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future, New York: Penguin.

Kurzweil, Ray (2005): The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, London: Penguin Books.

Latour, Bruno (1991): We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Leary, Kyree (2017): “Elon Musk Outlined the Two Critical Things Threatening Humanity”, Futurism, 21 November 2017: https://futurism.com/elon-musk-outlined-two-critical-things-threatening-humanity/, (accessed 27/07/18).

Leonhard, Gerd (2016): Technology vs. humanity: the coming clash between man and machine, London: Fast Future Publishing.

Lovén, Svante (1999): “Den tänkande maskinen: Datorerna i science fiction”, Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap, 28:3–4, 19–38.

MacLeod, Ken (1998): The Cassini Division, New York: Tor Books.

McCauley, Lee (2007): “The Frankenstein Complex and Asimov’s Three Laws”, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence: https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2007/WS-07-07/WS07-07-003.pdf, (accessed 27/07/18).

Miller, Riel (2007): “Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method,” Futures, 39:4, 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.001

Miller, Riel (2018): Transforming the Future: Anticipation in the 21st Century, New York: UNESCO and Routledge.

Monbiot, George (2017): Out of the Wreckage: A New Politics for an Age of Crisis, London: Verso.

Mori, Masahiro (2012 [1970]): “The Uncanny Valley” [trans. Karl F. MacDorman & Norri Kageki], IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 12 June 2012: https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/the-uncanny-valley, (accessed 20/08/18).

Morozov, Evgeny (2014): To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism, New York: Public Affairs.

Mosco, Vincent (2004): The Digital Sublime, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nature (2016): “The computer that mastered Go”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-dKXOlsf98&t=252s, (accessed 27/07/18).

Nye, David (1994): American Technological Sublime, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

O’Connell, Mark (2017): To Be a Machine: Adventures Among Cyborgs, Utopians, Hackers, and the Futurists Solving the Modest Problem of Death, New York: Doubleday.

O’Neill, Cathy (2016): Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, New York: Penguin.

Pasquale, Frank (2016): The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schwartz, Oscar (2018): “‘The discourse is unhinged’: how the media gets AI alarmingly wrong”, The Guardian, 25 July 2018: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/25/ai-artificial-intelligence-social-media-bots-wrong, (accessed 25/07/18).

Science Channel (2010): Sci-Fi Science: A.I. Uprising.

Suvin, Darko (2016 [1979]): Metamorphoses of Science Fiction, Bern: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0353-0735-1

Turkle, Sherry (2011): Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other, New York: Basic Books.

Winner, Langdon (1977): Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Withers, Rachel (2017): “The EU Is Trying to Decide Whether to Grant Robots Personhood,” Slate.com, 17 April 2017: https://slate.com/technology/2018/04/the-eu-is-trying-to-decide-whether-to-grant-robots-personhood.html, (accessed 17/04/17).

Wyatt, Jeremy (2018): “What can we expect from the coming wave of ‘dexterous robots’?,” TheBigQ.com, 1 February 2018: https://www.thebigq.org/2018/02/01/what-can-we-expect-from-the-coming-wave-of-dexterous-robots/, (accessed 12/02/18).