Monetizing Amateurs. Artistic Critique, New Online Record Production and Neoliberal Conjuncture
Artistic Critique, New Amateur Music Economy and Neoliberal Conjuncture
Keywords:New music economy, conjunctural analysis, micro-labels, artistic critique, neoliberalism.
This article examines an emerging academic discourse of new online record production. It represents amateur musicians and producers – with access to new digital production and communication tools – as entrepreneurial, aspiring professionals. The article then connects the discourse with its political, economic, and social context – or the neoliberal conjuncture. From the critical standpoint of conjunctural analysis it takes note of the albeit uneven nature of this neoliberalisation when it comes to certain cultural formations such as the “underground”, “do-it-yourself” and “independent micro-label” music scenes, who are considered to be maintaining “the artistic critique of capitalism”, as outlined by Luc Boltanski and Eve Chiapello. While the latter suggest that this critique has been, for all intents and purposes, assimilated into capitalism; the case of underground and independent micro-label scenes would seem to repudiate the prevailing neoliberal notions of utilitarian music-making in the new online record production framework. This being said, the article does consider that it might be necessary to revise aspects of the artistic critique rehearsed in music scenes such as the aforementioned for it to remain relevant in the new digital communication environment.
Anderson, Tim J. (2014): Popular Music in a Digital Music Economy: Problems and Practices for an Emerging Service Industry, New York: Routledge.
Baym, Nancy K. (2011): “The Swedish Model: Balancing Markets and Gifts in the Music Industry”, Popular Communication, 9: 1, 22-38.
Baym, Nancy K. (2018): Playing to the Crowd: Musicians, Audiences, and the Intimate Work of Connection, New York: New York University Press.
Bennett, Andy and Paula Guerra (2018): “Rethinking DIY Culture in a Post-Industrial and Global Context”, Andy Bennett and Paula Guerra (eds): DIY Cultures and Underground Music Scenes, New York: Routledge, 1-15.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998): Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market, Ric- hard Nice (tl.), New York: New Press.
Bruenger, David (2016): Making Money, Making Music. History and Core Concepts, Oakland (CA): University of California Press.
Burgess, Richard James (2014): The History of Music Production, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clarke, John. (2014): “Imagined, Real and Moral Economies”, Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 6: 1, 95-112.
Clarke, John. (2010): “Of Crises and Conjunctures: The Problem of the Present”, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 34: 4, 337-354.
Clarke, John. (2008): “Living with/in and without Neo-Liberalism”, Focaal, 51, 135-147.
Clemons, Eric K. (2009): “The Complex Problem of Monetizing Virtual Electronic Social Networks”, Decision Support Systems, 48: 1, 46-56.
Collins, Steve and Sherman Young (2014): Beyond 2.0: The Future of Music, Sheffield: Equinox.
Davies, William (2014): The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition, London: Sage.
Encarnacao, John (2013): Punk Aesthetics and New Folk : Way Down the Old Plank Road, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Finnegan, Ruth (1989): The Hidden Musicians: Music Making in an English Town, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fleischer, Rasmus (2010): “The Revenge of Beer-Fiddlers? the Regulation of Amateurs in Musical Life”, Eurozine, 18 January.
Fornäs, Johan. (2014): “Introducing Capitalism: Current Crisis and Cultural Critique”, Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 6: 1, 15-38.
Foucault, Michel ( 2008): The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College De France, 1978–1979 [Naissance de la Biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France, 1978–1979]. Translated by Graham Burchell, edited by Michel Senellart, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fuchs, Christian and Marisol Sandoval (2014): “Introduction: Critique, Social Media and the Information Society in the Age of Capitalist Crisis”, Christian Fuchs and Marisol Sandoval (eds) : Critique, Social Media and the Information Society, New York: Routledge.
Gilbert, Jeremy (2017): “Experimental Politics: Its Background and some Implications”, Maurizio Lazzarato: Experimental Politics: Work, Welfare, and Creativity in the Neoliberal Age, Cambridge, Jeremy Gilbert (ed.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gosling, Tim. (2004): “‘Not for Sale’: The Underground Network of anarcho–punk”, Andy Bennett and Richard A. Peterson (eds.) Music Scenes: Local, Translocal, and Virtual, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 168-186.
Graham, Phil (2013): “Australian Copyright Regimes and Political Economy of Music”, Peter Tschmuck, Philip L. Pearce and Steven Campbell (eds.) Music Business and the Experience Economy, Heidelberg: Springer, 11-26.
Graham, Stephen (2016): Sounds of the Underground: A Cultural, Political, and Aesthetic Mapping of Underground and Fringe Music, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Grossberg, Lawrence (2010): “Standing on a Bridge: Rescuing Economies from Economists”, Journal of Communication Inquiry 34: 4, 316-336.
Harvey, David (2005): A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Haynes, Jo and Lee Marshall. (2017a): “Beats and Tweets: Social Media in the Careers of Independent Musicians”, New Media & Society, 20:5, 1973-1993.
Haynes, Jo and Lee Marshall. (2017b): “Reluctant Entrepreneurs: Musicians and Entrepreneurship in the ‘new’ music Industry”, The British Journal of Sociology 69: 2, 459-482.
Hearn, Greg, Abraham Ninan, Ian Rogers, Stuart Cunningham, and Susan Luckman. (2004): “From the Margins to the Mainstream: Creating Value in Queensland’s Music Industry”, Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, 112: 1, 101-114.
Hesmondhalgh, David. (2014): “The Menace of Instrumentalism in Media Industries Research and Education”, Media Industries, 1: 1, http://www.mediaindustriesjournal.org/index.php/mij/article/view/15/57
Hesmondhalgh, David. (1998): “Post-Punk’s Attempt to Democratise the Music Industry: The Success and Failure of Rough Trade”, Popular Music, 16: 03, 255-274.
Hesmondhalgh, David and Leslie Meier (2015): “Popular Music, Independence and the Concept of the Alternative in Contemporary Capitalism”, James Bennett and Nikki Strange (eds.): Media Independence, New York: Routledge.
Hracs, Brian J. (2012): “A Creative Industry in Transition: The Rise of Digitally Driven Independent Music Production”, Growth and Change 43: 3, 442-461.
Jenkins, Henry (2006): Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York: New York University Press.
Keen, Andrew (2006): The Cult of the Amateur: How the Democratization of the Digital World is Assaulting our Economy, our Culture, and our Values, New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Kelly, Kevin (2008) “1,000 True Fans”, The Technium, March 4, https://kk.org/thetechnium/1000-true-fans/. Retrieved May 11, 2020.
Kim, Jin. (2012): “The Institutionalization of YouTube: From User-Generated Content to Professionally Generated Content”, Media, Culture & Society, 34: 1, 53-67.
Konings, Martijn. (2017): “From Hayek to Trump: The Logic of Neoliberal Democracy”, Socialist Register, 54: 54.
Lazzarato, Maurizio (2017): “The Government of Inequalities: Critique of Neoliberal Insecurity”, Lazzarato: Experimental Politics: Work, Welfare, and Creativity in the Neoliberal Age, Jeremy Gilbert (ed.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lazzarato, Maurizio (2015): Governing by Debt, New York: Semiotext (e).
Lazzarato, Maurizio (2012): The Making of the Indebted Man: An Essay on the Neoliberal Condition, Joshua David Jordan (tl.), New York: Semiotext (e).
León, Javier F. (2014): “Introduction: Music, Music Making and Neoliberalism”, Cul- ture, Theory and Critique, 55: 2, 129-137.
McGuigan, Jim. (2014): “The Neoliberal Self”, Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 6: 1, 223-240.
Mulligan, Mark. (2017): “Welcome to the Post-DIY Era”, Music Industry Blog, Mar- ch 20, https://musicindustryblog.wordpress.com/2017/03/20/welcome-to-the-postdiy-era/ (retrieved Sep. 27, 2018).
O’Connor, Alan (2008): Punk Record Labels and the Struggle for Autonomy: The Emergence of DIY, Washington DC: Lexington Books.
Ong, Aihwa (2006): Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sove- reignty, Durham (N.C): Duke University Press.
Piketty, Thomas (2014): Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Plehwe, D. and T. Mills (2012): “Defending Capitalism: The Rise of the Neoliberal Thought Collective (Part 2).” New Left Project, http://www.newleftproject.org/index.php/site/article_comments/defending_capitalism_the_rise_of_the_neolibe- ral_thought_collective_part_2 (accessed 10/01/18) .
Polanyi, Karl (2009): Suuri murros: Aikakautemme poliittiset ja taloudelliset juuret [The Great Transformation], Natasha Vilokkinen (tl.), Tampere: Vastapaino.
Prior, Nick (2014): “Beyond Napster: Popular Music and the Normal Internet”, Andy Bennett and Steve Waksman (eds.) : The Sage Handbook of Popular Music, Lon- don: Sage, 493-507.
Prior, Nick (2010): “The Rise of the New Amateurs: Popular Music, Digital Technology and the Fate of Cultural Production”, John Hall, Laura Grindstaff and Ming-Cheng Lo (eds.) : Handbook of Cultural Sociology, London: Routledge, 398-407.
Prior, Nick (2018): Popular Music, Digital Technology and Society, Los Angeles: Sage.
Rancière, Jacques (2009): The Emancipated Spectator, London: Verso.
Read, Jason (2009): “A Genealogy of Homo-Economicus: Neoliberalism and the Production of Subjectivity”, Foucault Studies, 5: 6, 25-36.
Reynolds, Simon. 2013. “The Wire 300: Simon Reynolds on the Hardcore Continuum #7: Grime (and A Little Dubstep).” The Wire, #348, February. Originally published as “The Primer: Grime” in The Wire #254, April 2005.
Ryan, Matthew. (2015): “Contesting ‘Actually Existing’ Neoliberalism”, Journal of Australian Political Economy, 39: 76, 79-102.
Skeggs, Beverley (2014): “Values Beyond Value? Is Anything Beyond the Logic of Capital?”, The British Journal of Sociology, 65: 1, 1-20.
Smythe, Dallas W. (2006): “On the Audience Commodity and its Work”, Douglas Kellner and Meenashi Durham (eds.): Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks, Oxford: Blackwell, 230-256. Originally published in 1981.
Strachan, Robert. 2003. Do-it-Yourself: Industry, Ideology, Aesthetics and Micro Independent Record Labels in the UK, PhD Thesis, University of Liverpool.
Strachan, Robert. (2007): “Micro-Independent Record Labels in the UK Discourse, DIY Cultural Production and the Music Industry”, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10: 2, 245-265.
Taylor, Timothy D. (2016): Music and Capitalism: A History of the Present, University of Chicago Press.
Tessler, Holly (2016): “Back in Black: Rethinking Core Competencies of the Recorded Music Industry”, Patrik Wikström and Robert DeFillippi (eds.): Business Innovation and Disruption in the Music Industry, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 33-52.
Toynbee, Jason (2000): Making Popular Music: Musicians, Creativity and Institu- tions, London: Arnold.
Tschmuck, Peter. (2016): “From Record Selling to Cultural Entrepreneurship: The Music Economy in the Digital Paradigm Shift”, Wikström and DeFillippi (eds.): Business Innovation and Disruption, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 13-32.
Wacquant, Loïc. (2012): “Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually Exis- ting Neoliberalism”, Social Anthropology, 20: 1, 66-79.
Wikström, Patrik (2009): The Music Industry: Music in the Cloud, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Williams, Raymond (1977): Marxism and Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Copyright (c) 2020 Juho Tuomas Kaitajärvi-Tiekso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.