The Uses of Art: Contemporary Changes in Cultural Consumption and the Function of Art
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.113475Keywords:
Art, cultural consumption, omnivore, cosmopolitanism, commonality, liquid modernityAbstract
In recent years aesthetics and cosmopolitanism have been linked in new ways. On the one hand, contemporary research in the sociology of art indicates an increasing openness and a potential cosmopolitanism in aesthetic taste and consumption. On the other hand, aesthetic concepts and ideals play an important but often implicit role in some of the theories of globalization and cosmopolitanism that inform cultural studies. By examining the interaction between these two tendencies and relating it to sociological and aesthetic theories, I will discuss the characteristics and the possible social implications of the apparent new openness. Does it indicate an increasing tolerance and commonality? Or does it rather point towards a new and more individualized understanding of the social function and legitimacy of art?
References
Bauman, Zygmunt (2001): Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Zygmunt (2002): “The 20th Century: the End or a Beginning?”, Thesis Eleven no. 70, 15-25.
Bauman, Zygmunt (2011): Culture in a Liquid Modern World, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, Ulrich & Elizabeth Beck-Gernsheim (2002): Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences, London: Sage.
Beck, Ulrich & Edgar Grande (2007): Cosmopolitan Europe, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Boltanski, Luc & Eve Chiapello (2005): “The New Spirit of Capitalism”, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18:3-4, 161-188.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1984/1979): Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, translated by Richard Nice, London: Routledge.
Dimaggio, Paul & Toqir Mukhtar (2008): “Arts Participation as Cultural Capital in the United States, 1982-2002”, Steven J. Tepper & Bill Ivey (eds.): Engaging Art. The Next Great Transformation of America’s Cultural Life, New York/London: Routledge, 169-194.
Emmison, Michael (2003): “Social Class and Cultural Mobility: Reconfiguring the Cultural Omnivore Thesis”, Journal of Sociology, 39, 211-230.
Eriksson, Birgit: ”Æstetik og politik mellem individ og fællesskab”, Henrik Kaare Nielsen & Karen-Margrethe Simonsen (eds.): Æstetik og politik, Aarhus: Klim, 2008, 116-131.
Goldberg, Amir (2011): “Mapping Shared Understandings Using Relational Class Analysis: The Case of the Cultural Omnivore Reexamined”, American Journal of Sociology, 116:5, 1397-1436.
Gray, John (2006): “Easier Said Than Done”, The Nation January 11.
Hermes, Joke (2005): Re-reading Popular Culture, Malden: Blackwell.
Jæger, Mads Meier & Tall Katz-Gerro (2010): “The Rise of the Eclectic Cultural Consumer in Denmark, 1964-2004”, The Sociological Quarterly, 51, 460-483.
Kant, Immanuel (2004/1790): The Critique of Judgment, translated by James Creed Meredith, http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/k/kant/immanuel/k16j/index.html (accessed 11/11 2008).
Katz-Gerro, Tally (2002): “Highbrow Cultural Consumption and Class Distinction in Italy, Israel, West Germany, Sweden, and the United States”, Social Forces, 81:1, 207-229.
Lahire, Bernard (2008): “The Individual and the Mixing of Genres: Cultural Dissonance and Self-distinction”, Poetics 36, 166-188.
Lash, Scott (2002): “Individualization in a Non-Linear Mode”, Ulrich Beck & Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim (eds): Individualization. London: Sage, vii-xiii.
Michaud, Yves (1998): “The End of the Utopia of Art”, Bartomeu Mari & Jean-Marie Schaeffer (eds.): Think Art. Theory and Practice in the Art of Today, Rotterdam: Witte de With Center for Contemporary Art, 131-156.
Ollivier, Michèle (2008): “Modes of Openness to Cultural Diversity: Humanist, Populist, Practical, and Indifferent”, Poetics 36, 120-147.
Peterson, Richard A. (1997): “The Rise and Fall of Highbrow Snobbery as a Status Marker”, Poetics 25, 75-92.
Peterson, Richard A. (2005): “Problems in Comparative Research: The Example of Omnivorousness”, Poetics 33, 257-282.
Peterson, Richard A. & Roger M. Kern 1996: “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore”, American Sociological Review, vol. 61 (October), 900-907.
Peterson, Richard A. & Gabriel Rossman (2008): “Changing Arts Audiences”, Steven J. Tepper & Bill Ivey (eds.): Engaging Art: The Next Great Transformation of America’s Cultural Life, New York/London: Routledge, 307-342.
Peterson, Richard A. & Albert Simkus (1992): “How Musical Tastes Mark Occupational Status Groups”, Michèle Lamont & Marcel Fournier (eds): Cultivating Differences, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Prieur, Annick, Lennart Rosenlund & Jakob Skjott-Larsen (2008): “Cultural Capital Today. A Case Study from Denmark”, Poetics 36, 45-71.
Rumford, Chris (2008): Cosmopolitan Spaces. New York: Routledge.
Sennett, Richard (1998): The Corrosion of Character. The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Sullivan, Oriel & Tally Katz-Gerro (2007): “The Omnivore Thesis Revisited: Voracious Cultural Consumers”, European Sociological Review, 23:2.
Urry. John (2002): Sociology Beyond Societies – Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century, London: Routledge.
van Eijck, Koen (2000): “Richard A. Peterson and the Culture of Consumption”, Poetics 28, 207-224.
Warde, Alan, David Wright & Modesto Gayo-Cal (2008): “The Omnivorous Orientation in the UK”, Poetics 36, 148-165.
Wynne, Derek & Justin O’Connor (1998): “Consumption and the Postmodern City”, Urban Studies, vol. 35,.5-6, 841-864.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Eriksson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.
