A sanctuary built on conflict
Searching for conflicts in retrospective Facebook groups
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.3946Keywords:
Digital memory, Connective memory, Digital heritage, Nostalgia, Disputes, Authority, social media, FacebookAbstract
This article investigates conflicts in retrospective Facebook groups, i.e., groups created with a particular interest and focus on the past, to analyse how members of these groups understand the past and how they negotiate, resist and challenge each other’s notions of the past. The data comes from a netnographic fieldwork within six such retrospective groups. Theoretical inspiration is drawn from Actor-Network-Theory (Harrison 2013, Latour 2005). The analysis thusly focuses on human (the members of the groups) as well as non-human actors (the operative logic of Facebook) and study how these produce associations between the past and the present. An overall result of the study is that the retrospective Facebook groups are not characterised by conflict. Instead, they are produced as places of sanctuary, where associations with the past becomes a basis for a nostalgic feel-good culture. However, the analysis also shows that the sanctuaries build on the production of a discontinuity and a conflict between the past and the present. Using Boym’s concept of ruinophilia, as well as Bauman’s concept of retrotopia, the article discusses how the conflicted discontinuity between the past and the present produces an us-and-them relationship where group members can come together in a nostalgic as well as a critical care for the world as it (in their perspectives) was supposed to be. The analysis also illustrates how members’ use of sources and references becomes a mere stylistic performance of authority, as the operative logic of Facebook not only enables but also constrains group interactions, reducing the members’ possibilities of having profound interactions and negotiations based on their memories and notions of the past. The article hereby contributes to the emerging research on digital memories in general, and memory work on Facebook in particular.
References
Association of Internet Researchers Ethics Working Group (2012): Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0), Available at: http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
Bauman, Zygmunt (2017): Retrotopia, Malden, MA: Polity
Boler, Megan & Davis, Elizabeth (2018): “The affective politics of the “post-truth” era: Feeling rules and networked subjectivity,” Emotion, Space and Society, 27, 75-85
Boym, Svetlana (2011): “Ruinophilia: Appreciation of Ruins,” Tranzit. Retrieved from: http://monumenttotransformation.org/atlas-of-transformation/html/r/ruinophilia/ruinophilia-appreciation-of-ruins-svetlana-boym.html
Davalos, Sergio, Merchant, Altaf, Rose, Gregory M., Lessley, Brenton J. & Teredesai, Ankur M. (2015): “‘The good old days’: An examination of nostalgia in Facebook posts,” Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 83, 83–93
De Kosnik, Abigail (2016): Rogue archives: digital cultural memory and media fandom, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
Ekelund, Robin (2017): Retrospektiva modernister: om historiens betydelse för nutida mods, Doctoral dissertation, Malmö högskola
Ekelund, Robin (2020): “Digital Memory Studies,” Scandia, 86:2, 119-135
Ekelund, Robin (forthcoming a): “Instant memories? Reflections on the connective turn and digital memory practices within retrospective Facebook groups,” In the process of publication.
Ekelund, Robin (forthcoming b): “Fascination, nostalgia, and knowledge desire in digital memory culture. Emotions and mood work in retrospective Facebook groups,” In the process of publication.
Garde-Hansen, Joanne (2009): “MyMemories? Personal Digital Archive Fever and Facebook”. Garde-Hansen, Joanne, Hoskins, Andrew & Reading, Anna (eds.): Save as-- digital memories, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Garde-Hansen, Joanne, Hoskins, Andrew & Reading, Anna (eds.) (2009): Save as-- digital memories, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Gregory, Jenny (2015): “Connecting with the past through social media: the ‘Beautiful buildings and cool places Perth has lost’ Facebook group,” International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21:1, 22-45
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich (2014): Our broad present: time and contemporary culture, New York: Columbia University Press
Harju, Anu (2015): “Socially shared mourning: construction and consumption of collective memory,” New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 21:1-2, 123-145
Harrison, Rodney (2013): Heritage: critical approaches, Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge
Hoskins, Andrew (2017a): “The restless past. An introduction to digital memory and media,” Hoskins, Andrew (ed.): Digital memory studies: media pasts in transition, New York: Routledge
Hoskins, Andrew (ed.) (2017b): Digital memory studies: media pasts in transition, New York: Routledge
Hoskins, Andrew (2017c): “Memory of the multitude. The end of collective memory,” Hoskins, Andrew (ed.): Digital memory studies: media pasts in transition, New York: Routledge
Jacobsen, Benjamin & Beer, David (2021): “Quantified Nostalgia: Social Media, Metrics, and Memory,” Social Media + Society, 7:2, 1-9
Kalinina, Ekaterina & Menke, Manuel (2016): “Negotiating the past in hyperconnected memory cultures: post-Soviet nostalgia and national identity in Russian online communities,” International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 12(1), 59–74
Kaun, Anne & Stiernstedt, Fredrik (2014): “Facebook time: technological and institutional affordances for media memories,” New Media & Society, 16(7), 1154–1168
Kozinets, Robert (2015): Netnography: redefined, 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd
Lagerkvist, Amanda (2013): “New memory cultures and death: Existential security in the digital memory ecology,” Thanatos, 2(2), 8–24
Lagerkvist, Amanda (2014): “A Quest for Communitas: Rethinking Mediated Memory Existentially,” Nordicom Review 35: 205-218
Lagerkvist, Amanda (2015): “The netlore of the infinite: death (and beyond) in the digital memory ecology,” New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 21(1-2), 185-195
Latour, Bruno (2005): Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory, Oxford: University Press
Makhortykh, Mykola (2021): “Memoriae ex machina: How Algorithms Make Us Remember and
Forget,” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 22:2, 180-185
Niemeyer, Katharina (2014): Media and Nostalgia: Yearning for the Past, Present and Future, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Niemeyer, Katharina & Keightley, Emily (2020): “The commodification of time and memory: Online communities and the dynamics of commercially produced nostalgia,” New Media & Society, 22(9), 1639-1662
Poga?ar, Martin (2017): “Culture of the past. Digital connectivity and dispontentiated futures,” Hoskins, Andrew (ed.): Digital memory studies: media pasts in transition, New York: Routledge
Reading, Anna (2016): Gender and memory in the globital age, London: Palgrave Macmillan
Robards, Brady, Lincoln, Sian, Pinkard, Benjamin & Harris, Jane (2018): “Remembering Through Facebook: Mediated Memory and Intimate Digital Traces,” Dobson, Amy Shields, Robards, Brady & Carah, Nicholas (eds.): Digital intimate publics and social media, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan
Smit, Rik, Heinrich, Ansgard & Broersma, Marcel (2018): “Activating the past in the Ferguson protests: Memory work, digital activism and the politics of platforms,” New Media & Society, 20(9), 3119–3139
van Dijck, José (2007): Mediated memories in the digital age, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
van Dijck, José (2017): “Connective Memory. How Facebook Takes Charge of Your Past,” Bond, Lucy, Craps, Stef & Vermeulen, Pieter (eds.): Memory unbound - tracing the dynamics of memory studies, New York: Berghahn Books
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Robin Ekelund
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for all manuscripts rests with the author(s). The editors reserve the right to edit manuscripts. Contributors are responsible for acquiring all permissions from the copyright owners for the use of quotations, illustrations, tables, etc. Each author must, before final publication fill, in a publishing agreement provided by LiU E-Press.
Since 2021 Culture Unbound uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license for new articles, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given. For older articles please see each article landing page.