Migrant Life Stories as Digital Heritage

Authors

  • Malin Thor Tureby
  • Jesper Johansson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.4411

Keywords:

migrants, digitization, oral history, patrimonialization, digital heritage, participation, co-creation, life stories

Abstract

Following the ambitions of international and national policy makers to digitalize the cultural heritage sector, a growing research field that deals with digitalization and cultural heritage has emerged. However, it has been argued that too much focus has been placed on technology and information policy issues and that research on how to achieve administrative effectiveness and preservation has taken precedence over studies of different actors’ engagement, participation and access to cultural heritage. Previous studies have also tended to problematize the “hows” rather than the “whys” of processes associated with digital heritage and digitalization. In addition, research has shown that collections documenting minorities and marginalized groups have been excluded from national strategies concerning the digitalization of cultural heritage. Therefore, the aim of this article is to investigate why and under what conditions digital heritage about and with migrants has been initiated, created and curated. We study the motives and the roles of different stakeholders in the digitization and patrimonialization processes of one collection containing life stories from migrants. Furthermore, in the article we understand stakeholders not only as decision makers, owners or managers, but also as any person or organization that feels affected by whatever happens to the object or piece defined as heritage. Consequently, a central element in the methodology of this research was the interviews conducted with crucial actors in relation to their engagements with the studied collection. During the interviews, we paid specific attention to the different motives of the involved stakeholders and why it was important to them that the collection was created and digitized.

References

Abrams, Lynn (2016): Oral History Theory, London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315640761

Audunson, Ragnar, Andresen, Herbjørn, Andresen, Eagerlid, Cicilie, Henningsen, Erik, Hobohm, Hans-Christoph, Jochumsen, Henrik, Larsen, Håkon & Vold, Torje (2020): Libraries, Archives, and Museums as Democratic Spaces in a Digital Age, Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110636628

Caswell, Michelle, Harter, Christopher & Jules, Bergis (2017): “Diversifying the Digital Historical Record: Integrating Community Archives in National Strategies for Access to Digital Cultural Heritage”, D-Lib Magazine, 23:5-6, https://doi.org/10.1045/may2017-caswell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1045/may2017-caswell

Council of Europe (2017): Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the European Cultural Heritage Strategy for the 21st Century, 22 February 2017.

Engman, Jonas (2019): “Migration – Voices in Movement”, Jonas Engman & Lisa Söderlindh (eds), 87 Voices on Migration, Stockholm, Nordiska Museets förlag: 220–224.

Frigolé, Joan (2010): “Patrimonialization and Mercantilization of the Authentic. Two Fundamental Strategies in a Tertiary Economy”, Xavier Roigé, & Joan Frigole (eds.): Constructing cultural and natural heritage: parks, museums and rural heritage, Girona: Documenta Universitaria, 13–24.

Henningsen, Erik & Larsen, Håkon, (2020): “The Mystification of Digital Technology in Norwegian Policies on Archives, Libraries and Museums: Digitalization as Policy Imperative”, Culture Unbound - Journal of Current Cultural Research,12:2: 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.20200504b

Kortekaas, Katia, Hueso (2017): “Is there a Model for Successful Patrimonialization Processes? A Tale of Three Cites, Oppidum, 13, 317–341.

Lenstra, Noah, (2017): “Social Inequalities in the Shaping of Cultural Heritage Infrastructure, in Henriette Roued-Cuncliffe & Andrea Copeland (eds.): Participatory Heritage, London: Facet Publishing, 97–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783301256.011

Le Roux, C (2016): “Oral History Research Ethics: Should Anonymity and Confidentiality Issues Be Dealt with on Their Own Merit?”, Africa Education Review, 12:4, 552–566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2015.1112132

MIG Talks (2019): www.migtalks.se, [Accessed 15/2 2019].

Ministry of Culture (2011): Digit@lt kulturarv – Nationell strategi för arbetet med att digitalisera, digitalt bevara och digitalt tillgängliggöra kulturarvsmaterial och kulturarvsinformation 2012–2015.

Minnen (2020): Minnen en källa till personliga berättelser.https://www.nordiskamuseet.se/minnen [Accessed 22/2 2020].

Moore, Niamh (2012): “The Politics and Ethics of Naming: Questioning Anonymisation in (Archival) Research”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15:4, 331–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.688330

Nordiska museet (2016): Digit@lt kulturarv. Stiftelsen Nordiska museets strategi och plan för digitalisering och tillgänglighet. Regeringsuppdrag Ku2011/1968/KA 2016-02-08, Dnr A15-547/11.

Nordiska museet’s archive (NMA): MIGTalks, Consent forms from interviewed migrants.

Olsson, Annika (2015): ”Från att ge röst till att ge plats. Oral history, retorik och intersektionalitet”, Malin, Thor Tureby & Lars. Hansson (eds.): Muntlig historia – i teori och praktik, Lund: Studentlitteratur, 41–57.

Prescott, Andrew & Hughes, Lorna (2018): “Why do we digitize? The Case for Slow Digitization”, Archive Journal Available at: http://www.archivejournal.net/essays/why-do-we-digitize-the-case-for-slow-digitization/

Proposition 2016/17:116: Kulturarvspolitik, Stockholm: Kulturdepartementet.

Robinson, Laura, Cotten, Shelia R., Ono, Hiroshi, Quan-Haase, Anabel, Mensch, Gustavo, Chen, Wenhong, Schultz, Jeremy, Timothy M. Hale, Timothy M. & Stern, Michael J., “Digital Inequalities and why they matter” (2015): Information, Communication & Society, 18:5, 569–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532

Sciurba, Allesandra. (2015): “Moving Beyond the Collateral Effects of the Patrimonialisation: The Faro Convention and the ‘Commonification’ of Cultural Heritage”, Lauso Zagato, & Marilena Vecco (eds.): Citizens of Europe. Culture e Diritti, Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina, 457–478.

Smith, Laurajane, (2006): Uses of Heritage, London, New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263

Spotts, Lydia & Copeland, Andrea, (2017): “Issues with Archiving Community Data”, Henriette Roued-Cuncliffe & Andrea Copeland (eds.), Participatory Heritage, London: Facet Publishing, 129–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783301256.014

Stalder, Felix (2018): The Digital Condition, Newark: Polity Press.

Swedish National Digitalization Council (2018): En lägesbild av digital kompetens (A situational picture of digital competence). May 2018. Dnr:18-5698. https://digitaliseringsradet.se/media/1213/lagesbild_digitalkompetens_slutversion_utanappendix.pdf [Accessed 2019-03-19].

Söderlindh, Lisa Monique (2019): ”Migration – the Great Narrative of our Time”, Jonas Engman & Lisa Söderlindh (eds), 87 Voices on Migration, Stockholm: Nordiska Museets förlag, 214–219.

Thor Tureby, Malin (2019): ”Makten över kunskapsproduktionen. Den institutionaliserade etikprövningen och humanistisk och kulturvetenskaplig forskning” [The power over knowledge production. Institutionalized ethical vetting and humanistic and cultural studies], Kulturella Perspektiv. Svensk etnologisk tidskrift, 28: 1–2, 17–29.

Thor Tureby, Malin & Johansson, Jesper (2020): Migration och kulturarv. Insamlingsprocesser och berättelser om och med de invandrade 1970–2019, Lund: Nordic Academic Press.

Thor Tureby, Malin & Wagrell, Kristin (2020): “Digitization, Vulnerability, and Holocaust Collections”, Santander Art and Culture Law Review 2:6, 87–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.20.012.13015

Thylstrup, Nanna Bonde (2019): The Politics of Mass Digitization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11404.001.0001

UNESCO (2016): Rekommendation om skydd för och främjande av museer och samlingar, deras mångfald samt roll i samhället. Antagen av Unsecos Generalkonferens den 17 november 2015. Svenska Unescorådet.

Vaccaro, Ismael, & Beltran, Oriol (2009): “Livestock Versus ‘Wild Beasts’: Contradictions in the Natural Patrimonialization of the Pyrenees”, The Geographical Review, 99:4, 499–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2009.tb00444.x

Vaccaro, Ismael & Beltran, Oriol (2010): “Turning Nature into Collective Heritage: The Social Framework of the Process of Patrimonialization of Nature”, Xavier Roigé, & Joan Frigole (eds.): Constructing Cultural and Natural Heritage: Parks, Museums and Rural Heritage, Girona: Documenta Universitaria, 63–74.

Valtysson, Bjarki (2017): “From Policy to Platform: The Digitization of Danish Cultural Heritage”, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23:5, 545–561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1084300

von Schorlemer, Sabine (2020): “UNESCO and the Challenge of Preserving the Digital Cultural Heritage”, Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 6:2: 33–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.20.010.13013

Downloads

Published

2022-07-07

Issue

Section

Digital Heritage In Cultural Conflicts